• ScaredDuck@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there any information on the performance impact of the microcode fix or is it too early for that?

    • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So far the word is the microcode fix causes negligible performance impact, but using the MSR fix causes 5-15% loss. In my own testing on EPYC hardware, microcode made no noticable difference to my workloads and benchmarks. Same as random noise in results.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s worth noting these are the firmware / microcode fixes.

      There’s already a software solution available,

      There is a software workaround, you can set the chicken bit DE_CFG[9]. This may have some performance cost, and the microcode update is preferred.

      source: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/24/3

      AMD has also already released a fix for the big boy - the EPYC processor.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The MSR bit is potentially a large performance loss and AMD recommends their partners not use it. In my tests is was 5-15% on EPYC depending on workload. “Some performance cost” is really hiding the reality of that bit.