FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet

  • mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gigabit symmetrical or GTFO.

    I pay something like $110/mo for my symmetrical gigabit fiber line (plus static IP). This should be the standard, not 100Mbps.

    • Psythik@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In rural areas, yes.

      In cities, Gigabit internet is abundant and only mildly expensive. Here in Phoenix I pay $60/mo for 1 Gbps down, 50 Mbps up with no bandwidth cap from Verizon. Not the best but far from “awful”.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And? CableOne promised us 300Mbps, we already had 100. Then they went and renamed themselves Sparklight…

    Guess what went out the window?..

  • BrooklynMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    why just 100Mbps? why not 250? that’s still pretty simple for them to do. also: net neutrality, dammit!

    • picassowary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      where i live my choices are fixed beam wireless internet that caps out at about 75mbps, at&t dsl that caps at 10mbps, satellite or i guess Starlink

        • picassowary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          super healthy, very competitive

          did i mention that i barely get 5G service at my home but if i walk 100ft down to the street i get service?

          • cookiecollision@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In my small town, we only had 4g lte, but it was quick. That is until 2 months ago, they ‘updated the towers’ to give us 5g… except now nothing works. My phone shows 5g but I have zero bars and zero service. When I switch phone to lte, it’ll show full bars but has zero service. It often completely drops to SOS mode. It’s ridiculous. Several people in town have contacted Verizon and the FCC and Verizon’s official response has been, “we are aware that service is not optimal in this area, but we currently have no plans to fix it. If you are unhappy with our coverage, we encourage you to switch providers.” It’s infuriating. They’ve “updated” the town’s service from LTE to broken 5G/nothing at all and said “yeah what’re you gonna do about it, leave if you don’t like it” knowing that their tower is the only tower in the area.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only that, 100Mbps is so 2018. Quit pussy-footing around, FCC, make the standard 1Gbps, both ways. And make bandwidth caps illegal. I’m lucky enough to not have one but for years I had to put up with a 1TB limit from those Cox suckers until Verizon came to town.

      • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know what, I’m just happy some progress is being made if 100 becomes minimum. A lot of rural areas have much less than that. I wish 1gbps was the new minimum though.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do United States really doesn’t want to live in the 21st century does it?

        The slowest speed by internet service provider offers is 250mbps.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We spent like 5k per household to get fiber everywhere in the US. Then the companies who were supposed to do it just decided to take the money and not do it.

  • Saff@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re going to initiate a new rollout of tech, why rollout already out of date stuff? Just mandate fibre to the prem and 1 gigabit minimum from the start. It will take 15 years to complete anyway!

    • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Government officials in areas where 100 Mbps internet isn’t already available are too busy making sure trans people can’t use the toilet or play high school sports.