I’m neutral-positive toward local AI, not so much toward Clawd-style agents impersonating humans on the web

No bad deed goes unrewarded

I don’t like where things are headed

Don’t worry, Google is trying to confuse you

Nah I’m vegan but thanks

🍎🔫🐧

Public domain code is a subset of FOSS code, so I don’t think that was inaccurate

It already is, vibe coders cannot hold copyright on AI-generated code

I may be wrong but I think current legal understanding doesn’t support this

Ecosia is nice but is it really privacy-respecting?

Wow, that’s sad

Seems to currently be worked on https://github.com/commetchat/commet/issues/115

It supports the goal of free knowledge, so I think it wouldn’t veer far off its mission

It would be pretty incredible if the Wikimedia Foundation started a project to archive the web

This appears to be a sweeping statement that would be very hard to confirm or deny.

The burden of proof is on who makes the initial claim, in this case, the seller. In traditional markets the state forces pharma companies to prove their claims, but in the dark web it’s the wild west. Great way to scam people.