The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
    53·
    10 months ago

    Reproducing the contents of those works as they have is

    This did not occur.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
      43·
      10 months ago

      When they reproduced Fry’s voice with an AI based on what they captured from the copyrighted audiobook, that’s precisely what happened. Just because you refuse to understand or admit it, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

      • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
        53·
        10 months ago

        That’s not reproduction of content so isn’t a copyright violation. Not shouldn’t be. Literally right now is not.

        The whole reason people are so up in arms about this is that we do not currently have laws or even standards that accurately police this kind of thing.

        • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
          44·
          10 months ago

          That is not for you to decide. That is for a court to decide. By the letter of the law, and how current copyright law is written, it very clearly is.

          • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
            53·
            10 months ago

            I am describing the current situation. You are the one describing events you hope to occur.

            • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
              43·
              10 months ago

              You are twisting yourself into knots to describe something other than what happened. All of which amounts to is an elaborate “Nuh uh”

              • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
                53·
                10 months ago

                No I’m looking at this the way a lawyer does.

                You know, like for court.

                • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
                  33·
                  10 months ago

                  So, like, arguing against the letter of the law, in order to defend a morally bankrupt practice in defense of profitability for large corporations, to rip off artists work.

                  No, I got that

                  • SCB@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    43·
                    10 months ago

                    That you think I am defending the people using Fry’s voice here is just further confirmation that you don’t understand what I’m saying.

                    I’m saying there aren’t laws or standards that accurately restrict this usage, and that is a bad thing and why people are upset.