• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Backdoors make it “technically feasible” to scan “e2ee”. See, it’s all a matter of perspective.

    • zelet@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fucking doublespeak (not you). If you can scan it then it isn’t e2ee. Words mean things. E2ee means that the two parties are the only two who can read the message. If there is a way to do any analysis on the message at all then it isn’t e2ee.

      • Teppic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I largely agree with you, technically it is still E2EE even if the encryption is very poor (e.g. hey look I shifted every character by one along the ASCII table).
        Poor encryption could then be broken by a party in the middle.

        All of that said this is a bit irrelevant, if the encryption is so poor the provider can break it at will, so can bad actors. We don’t use broken (bad) encryption for a reason.

        • XTL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Companies also advertise e2ee while they generate and store the encryption keys on their server. So, it is encrypted all the way, but still easy enough to decrypt when needed. Very technically feasible and still strong against third parties.