• tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    My theory is Google etc. focus on cameras so much because reviewers are media people that take a lot of videos and photos… if you want a good review you ship a good camera.

    Meanwhile all I want to see as an ordinary user is battery life, size and weight. If I take a photo it’s going on facebook (Well, more like mastodon these days) and any camera phone made in the last 10 years is fine.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I feel you. I went for a pixel 7 so that I can use GrapheneOS, but this thing is a hefty-chonker, and if i am bored at work, the battery will barely make it through the day. My former CCP-branded phone was much lighter and would easily last 2 days with one charge when new.

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can clearly see a qualitative difference between good and bad cameras even onf facebook-sized photos.

      • S_204@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure, but for the vast majority of people the difference is completely irrelevant. 4k to 8k doesn’t matter, we’re already in HD.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not about the resolution which as you mention is already more than sufficient. But you can easily see bad optics, bad color rendition, oversharpening etc. on a 500px image.