• Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You mean I’ve actually read the scientific data and evidence going back years before the pandemic? The research they were doing there and in Germany was well known and openly available. Published papers and all.

    • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You haven’t read anything that proves COVID-19 wasn’t a lab leak, and everything you’ve read filtered through the people responsible. But you are invested in convincing me it wasn’t.

      • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do you think scientific publications work?

        They don’t go through the high council of evil science-lords first.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now I want to be invited to an evil science-lord convention.

          Bonus points if it is held in an underground volcanic lair.

        • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you seen any scientific publications posted to these comments that prove the pandimic didn’t result from a lab leak? I haven’t.

          • notacat@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What possible evidence would there be to “prove” this negative? Maybe if we happened to find the exact source animal to test? Since that is unlikely, all we have to go is the genome of the virus compared to similar viruses in the wild and similar viruses in published research. And that wouldn’t be proof enough for you.

            • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              You don’t need to prove or disprove a negative. You simply must allow for it to be a possibility unless evidence comes forth which proves that the doubts are unfounded. For instance, if patient zero was found and they had no contact with the lab, if a wild source of COVID-19 with the same genetic structure was found, or if it was proven than none of the samples in the lab could be the source of the infection.

              The problem here is that I opened up the possibility by asking the question, and hateful, partial, non-scientific minds decided to dogpile me for threatening their beliefs and faith in authority.

            • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              My own what? I am posting my own doubts about the story. Do I need evidence to distrust two governments with a history of experimenting on their populations?

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The very scientist who first suggested that Covid was man-made changed his mind after doing further research and discovering that the components he thought were man-made were actually found in other wild Sars viruses.

        You’re the one who refuses to listen to actual evidence beyond the initial claims you first heard.