- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Mozilla seems to be asleep at the wheel, when it once drove online activity and communications. We have some suggestions where it could go.
Mozilla seems to be asleep at the wheel, when it once drove online activity and communications. We have some suggestions where it could go.
I don’t see the point, especially when there’s Tauri, which is a slim wrapper around whatever the default web view is on the target platform. That’s about as slim as you can get.
Mozilla making it would merely be a Firefox-based Electron competitor, which would probably end up being similar in terms of size. I think that should happen, but the goal shouldn’t be to make apps slimmer, but to make a real Electron competitor (i.e. something that packages the browser with the executable).
I’ve never heard of Tauri before. It’s almost exactly what I would hope for from mozilla, and perfect for some of the apps I want to make. Ty!
You’re welcome! I’m actually in the process of pitching it to my company to replace our Electron app, which has caused a bunch of problems for us.
Do you have a pros and cons between tauri and electron? Thank you
I’ll just describe how they work, and you can decide the pros and cons for yourself.
Electron:
Tauri:
I want to move our app to Tauri because:
So since we don’t need the features Electron offers, I want to use Tauri to reduce our maintenance overhead.