Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agoReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down111
arrow-up1222arrow-down1external-linkReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comTimely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareWalnutLum@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·13 days agoI still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
minus-squareexocortex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·13 days agoAI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·13 days agoSo for those in ML it’s easier?
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days agoNo it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.
I still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
AI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
So for those in ML it’s easier?
No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.