• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well I guess I’ll be mozying over to Rumble now.

    20 minutes later

    Turns out Jews are aliens directing the Democratic Party and Hollywood to sacrifice babies for adrenochrome. Why is the lamestream media not talking about this???

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It all becomes clear once you understand that the Jews returning to Israel is a precondition for the Christian apocalypse. Christofascists don’t give a flying fuck about the Jews; they support Israel as a country (and Zionism in particular) for the entirely ghoulishly selfish reason that they wanna get ‘raptured.’

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Imagine being Jewish and on either side people hate you.

        Right wing: Jews are behind everything

        Left wing: Jews are zionists and zionists are Nazis because Israel.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think left wing people are hating on Jewish people, except maybe those crazy “Marxist-Leninist” types. Not all Jewish people are pro-Natanyahu, in fact, many are probably against Netanyahu.

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      God I was looking for peertube apps and rumble was advertised in the app store. Boy did I have a surprise when I scrolled through the most subscribed list

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, don’t do that. The most popular content on YouTube isn’t bad in the same way it is on Rumble/Odyssey, but in general, it’s filled with clickbait/rage bait and is generally pretty awful. It’s going to be especially awful on Rumble and Odyssey because it’s a refuge for people who didn’t like YouTube’s policies, so it’s going to largely be conspiracy theorists and far right nonsense.

        That said, there’s some good on every platform. On Rumble, I like Glenn Greenwald, who is a right of center independent journalist who lives in Brazil (also gay, but that’s irrelevant). On Odyssey, I like Mental Outlaw (covers hacks, leaks, and privacy related news) and Naomi Brockwell (privacy advocacy). I don’t have an account at either, largely because those platforms are full of trash, I just sub through Grayjay so I don’t see that nonsense.

        I wish a credible alternative existed, but for now, I’ll hedge a bit with other platforms.

        • wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I remember, pre-wikileaks, when Glen Greenwald was left of center. Or at least that was my perspective at the time.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’d watch the shit outta that with some popcorn. Between the logic jumps and the mandatory hand-waving of actual evidence to the contrary, and sheer numbers of fallacies to make the argument make sense it sounds like a hella entertaining time

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Lol.

      There’s some decent content if you look. I like Glenn Greenwald, and I sub to NBTV and Mental Outlaw on Odyssey. There’s a lot of nonsense on all platforms, but if you’re careful, you may find some decent stuff there. I wish more YouTubers would re-upload on other platforms, but I guess that’s asking too much…

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    i use ublock origin

    reddit still good for something: Filter Lists–>uBlock filters–>uncheck the “ublock filters - quickfixes” box and then reload the page.

    this worked for me

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        They do random testing. I’ve received one of these a couple of times with unlock as well. Google/yt has not fully committed.

          • mesamune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah you and a lot of people. There’s a couple articles about it but essentially there’s some talk of pushback.

            And personally for me there are alternatives that people could use. While not a lot of people are on it, peertube is a viable alternative. I’ve watched a couple of small creators on it and it ha good performance. Just a very small audience.

            Makertube is one of my favorites.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I didn’t screencap it but today on YT I was given a modal that said I was using an adblocker (ublock) and I have three more videos before they require premium. I changed VPN locations and stopped getting the message.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Fuck reddit, this solution did not work for me. All YouTube videos stop buffering after 59 seconds. Only fixes i have found is with either making a custom userscript or disabling ublock from working on YouTube by whitelisting the entire domain.

    • Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find the adblock yt prompt only shows now when I try to open two tabs of YouTube. Second tab has this message but the first plays fine. I think ublock probably deployed a half fix already

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The whole idea that it violates the terms of service of a company to not let them show things on my screen without my consent is insane. It’s like if every time you went to the grocery store, the employees held you down and force fed you a free sample, then banned you from the store when you started running away from them.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not that bizarre. They don’t have to serve you the content without showing you the ads that make the platform profitable. The freedom goes both ways. I use an ad blocker too, but I don’t think that YouTube is really doing anything wrong here. (Other than possibly ruining their own platform, but that’s their problem that they’re making for themselves.)

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        If they weren’t a monopoly, I’d agree, they can do whatever they want.

        But since they are a monopoly, its a de facto the equivalent of a town square, and they are policing people’s speech, and broadcasting annoying public announcements that nobody wants to hear.

        • Robin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          A privately owned platform cannot serve the public good. There will always be conflicts of interest. A proper public square should be funded by a competent government (but those are rare) or decentralized.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I hate the way they‘re doing it and how they push their silly premium subscription in my face whenever I open the app to look something up quick. Adblock all the way. But you‘re right. They have to make money somehow. They‘re a corporation after all. It‘s naive to think they will ever give up.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The whole idea that it violates the terms of service of a company to not let them show things on my screen without my consent is insane.

      Something something contract of adhesion something something. It is functionally a term of service to watch the whole body of content as a condition of watching any of it.

      It’s like if every time you went to the grocery store, the employees held you down and force fed you a free sample, then banned you from the store when you started running away from them.

      This effectively used to be how people would sell Time Share rentals. You would “win” a “free vacation” to a destination that hosted the time share. Then, in order to check in you needed to sit through a sales pitch that only ended when you agreed to purchase the unit you’d allegedly been awarded as a prize.

      If you tried to leave the sales pitch prematurely, you were ejected from the venue.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, and there’s a reason contracts of adhesion are [supposed to be] illegal.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s worse than that. They use so much bw that most users have limited higher -speed to access, but they’re not giving anyone vouchers to pay for extra bandwidth.

  • Grenfur@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I just got the same warning on FF with uBlock. Both Freetube and NewPipe seem to be fine though. I guess Freetube it is until uBlock is patched.

    Edit: Also, glad I’m not the only human watching Grossi’s videos today lol.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    I kinda miss when places would host their own videos instead of relying on youtube, but that’s the problem of a centralized internet, the majority of people won’t want to leave yt/ig/fb/tiktok/twitter/reddit in order to watch or read whatever you posted.

    • Korkki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Centralisation and large scale has it’s benefits. There were also many problems with everybody hosting their stuff by themselves. Enshittification is results of private companies having to go profit first (and google being google of course), not so much because they are the only game in town. Being the monopoly merely enables the shitting on users for profit. I see youtube and many google services more like internet’s utilities that are privately owned and that is causing problems, not that they have gotten so big.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      No one understands the astronomical bandwidth, CPU/GPU intensive calcs, and data storage necessities required to do anything close to what YouTube currently does.

      There is no way under this warm sun that a fediverse version of YouTube will ever be feasible, unless someone like literally yourself is willing to pay extraordinary high amounts of money for all the required infrastructure and daily maintenance to run it.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would want to see some data on costs, because I think you might be overselling the difficulty and cost a bit (I don’t actually know, just my good faith belief). Imagine if every content creator ran their own instance. Instead of needing to worry about every user coming to a single group of servers, the Creator only needs to worry about the cost of hosting their own content and the traffic they get.

        With the number of YouTubers who have to get sponsorships and Patreon anyway, it doesn’t really seem that infeasible or unreasonable to expect content creators to run their own thing or pay to have someone else to do it. Doesn’t seem like the YouTube money is that lucrative, anymore, so not like it would be all that different, either.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Sure, but you’re assuming all content is on one server. With something like PeerTube, content is federated.

            That said, I don’t think federation is the solution here because a popular video is going to completely swamp that instance, but something P2P would probably work if you can stream from multiple seeders. Even if you copy like we do w/ Lemmy, you’d still end up with a handful of instances that are way more popular than the rest and those would get hammered if there’s a particularly popular video.

            If you can spread that $6B (ignoring bandwidth here) over 10M people, you end up with a very reasonable $600/year, and costs would go down as more people join the network. I also assume a lot of that is duplication to handle demand spikes, which is baked in to the P2P system, so a P2P system would probably be way cheaper to scale up.

            • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              If you read the links, this includes their server clusters and employees across the entire world all doing complex load balancing and maintenance.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Sure, and none of that is necessary with a proper P2P system. If I’m torrenting something, it’ll naturally pull from seeders near me over seeders on the other side of the planet, so load balancing happens by every client being greedy.

                The complex load balancing is only necessary because it’s a centralized service.

                • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  This protocol already exists and so does the system, PeerTube.

                  Why no significant quantity of people use it is apparent after you try it for a while; the entire server system cannot handle the commensurate volume of content and interactions that YouTube is popular for.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              but something P2P would probably work if you can stream from multiple seeders

              Which is, in fact, exactly how PeerTube works: it’s got BitTorrent built right into it.

              Frankly, it’s ridiculous how people keep harping on this “problem” as if it isn’t long since solved.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I thought it was largely federated? I don’t know how the internals work, so I don’t know what group of peers it’ll pull from.

                Regardless, the problem PeerTube has little to do with its technical foundation IMO, but the network effect. If we get people to start using it, either we’ll fix it or we’ll develop something better, but getting creators to move is the first step.

          • cobysev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            According to that first link, it costs $6.1 billion to $11.7 billion annually to run YouTube. Even if you segment that into niche video communities, it’ll still cost hundreds of millions of dollars annually to host it, if you get a decent amount of traffic.

            This is why YouTube is a monopoly. Because they have the ridiculous amount of money to throw at a “free” video hosting site. Any other video host would crumble under the weight of YouTube’s level of traffic. That’s also why some others, like Nebula, require a subscription model to function. Or any movie/TV show streaming service. They can’t afford to host that stuff for free.

            This is also why Google is so obsessed with cracking down on anti-ad software. That’s how they make the money that pays for YouTube.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              According to this, as of Jan 2024 there were 14 Billion videos on Yt. So effectively a dollar and change to host a video for all YT users.

              Obviously it doesn’t work like that, but if the above commenter’s point was that I, a content creator, host my video and manage my own costs, and that video is linked via whatever federation, I can monetize and limit as needed as a creator, thus popular videos get paid to host, and unpopular videos are hosted for more or less table stakes because they’re only getting X hits per Month.

              Some kind of WordPress-like container with a built-in safety switch for overages and - hey presto. Well, it’s a thought anyway.

              I dunno, it seems do-able, even if the Great Unwashed are going to stick with YT and getting ads up the wazoo to see “I Stuffed My Face In A Fusion Reactor - Watch What Happens Next” and the like.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Several tried. Nothing as elaborate as cross dissemination, federation or whatever. But at least 5 to 10 years ago it proved to be almost impossible. Platforms like Rooster teeth, which was 100% subscription based, I think never broke even and still relied on YT ads for the majority of the revenue. Some big and small channels tried to at least just catalog, archive and serve their own videos and the costs still became astronomical really fast. Whenever you see one of those very old channels, most of them don’t conserve copies, let alone original source footage of their entire material. Everyone just delete their videos once they’ve been on YouTube for a month or so now, and they have to download their own videos when they want to reuse old footage.

          Storage is cheap today, yes, but video really eats storage at an alarming rate. Specially now that 4k is the standard. So you have to reuse storage over and over. Transcoding is also really fast and optimized with modern algorithms, but it takes specialized graphical cards and data centers charge a premium to use servers with such capacities. Self hosting will never be able to satisfy a moderate demand. Get anything above 100 users simultaneously transcoding videos and a non-specialized server will halt to a grind just on IO calls to hard drives alone.

          Once you consider all those factors it is obvious why YouTube is such a miracle.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s such a miracle becuase the world gave it all of their content for free.

            At least in part.

      • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Monetization. Tumbleweed content-wise. Some content producers make content for money.

        Media reach: Content is stored, where the consumers look for it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        What part of “bittorrent” do you not understand? I am really getting fucking sick and tired of people like you posting this bullshit FUD.

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          PeerTube uses WebTorrent protocol and it still doesn’t do well with the same quantity of bandwidth demands.

          Post your own self-hosted PeerTube instance for us all to use then, let’s see who’s correct. Otherwise provide a solution or shut the fuck up.

    • bishbosh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Peertube, but it’s really not nearly the replacement lemmy or mastodon are.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yet. It’s still very new, and as enshittification increases, so will federated development.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Reddit is mostly text, with a few images for memes, very low in storage, processing power, or bandwidth, its easy to have a fediverse replacement.

      Youtube is a video platform. Video take a lot of storage, encoding/decoding, bandwidth…

      And video platforms are small amount of content creators, with 99 percent of the users being non-content-creating viewers. Once the content creators are on a monopoly platform (like youtube), there’s no incentive for them to leave. And fediverse wouldn’t have the same money to make.

      In contrast, anyone can find interesting links to post to a Reddit-alternative, anyone can make memes.

      TLDR: Reddit is community-focused. Youtube is creator-focused. Difference in hardware requirements. Theres no practical alternative for Youtube, especially not a fediverse one.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Delete this, YouTube will catch on and block this workaround.

      Edit: disregard. Here is a custom GreaseMonkey/ViolentMonkey userscript to automatically do this for you:

      // ==UserScript==
      // @name         YouTube to Embed Redirect (Desktop & Mobile)
      // @namespace    http://tampermonkey.net/
      // @version      1.1
      // @description  Redirects YouTube video URLs (desktop and mobile) to their embed version.
      // @author       BaroqueInMind
      // @match        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v*
      // @match        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v*
      // @grant        none
      // ==/UserScript==
      
      (function() {
          'use strict';
      
          // Extract the video ID from the URL
          const videoId = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get('v');
      
          if (videoId) {
              // Redirect to the embed URL
              window.location.href = `https://www.youtube.com/embed/$%7BvideoId%7D`;
          }
      })();
      
      
    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I always wonder what part of the world those who do are in. Cuz I get the feeling YouTube is only doing this shit in certain regions. Or if it’s just a hiccup with the adblocker itself, because it was shown pretty early on when these reports first started being posted that it was an issue with AdBlock Plus as well as there being workarounds for uBlock Origin due to some buggy Firefox updates.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, they’re trying new things again. Gotta squeeze that stone for all the blood that’s in it.

    One of my accounts has been getting a long delay before the video starts. Pre-roll ads are trying to load and play but the add-ons I have installed are still stopping them from completely succeeding. For now.

    I also have auto-play turned off, and I wonder if that has anything to do with it.

    Pretty sure the systems at their side think that I’m seeing the ads because I’ve had pop-ups during the delay offering free Premium.

  • Dimi Fisher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use Firefox on Linux Mint, none of this happens and if it does you fix it by copy pasting a code on the settings of ublock