moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square174fedilinkarrow-up1747arrow-down122
arrow-up1725arrow-down1external-linkX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square174fedilink
minus-squarenutsack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·edit-21 month agoi don’t understand how it’s a boycott or how is illegal or unfair
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·1 month agoIt’s not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He’s literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoAnd he’s now President of the US so he gets to make the laws.
minus-squareCitizenKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoAnd he bought the position fair and square.
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoCriminal contempt of business model
i don’t understand how it’s a boycott or how is illegal or unfair
It’s not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He’s literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.
And he’s now President of the US so he gets to make the laws.
And he bought the position fair and square.
Criminal contempt of business model