Jesus@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agoA New Form of Verification on Blueskybsky.socialexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up171arrow-down1external-linkA New Form of Verification on Blueskybsky.socialJesus@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square15linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareStefen Auris@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·16 days agoI don’t understand why they don’t just use the domain verification which is far more authoritative
minus-squareMudMan@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up13·16 days agoThey do. Probably should give it a clearer visual cue now that they do blue ticks, but it’s there.
minus-squareJesus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·16 days agoThey do. That said, now that it’s really easy to mask whois data, I would argue that’s a less than perfect solution.
minus-squareStefen Auris@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoGood point about that. However still someone has to actually purchase and own the thing and set up the verification all of which is independent from bluesky so it’s a start I suppose.
I don’t understand why they don’t just use the domain verification which is far more authoritative
They do.
Probably should give it a clearer visual cue now that they do blue ticks, but it’s there.
They do. That said, now that it’s really easy to mask whois data, I would argue that’s a less than perfect solution.
Good point about that. However still someone has to actually purchase and own the thing and set up the verification all of which is independent from bluesky so it’s a start I suppose.