• pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t understand why this was downvoted, if such a proposal had been made in 2022 during first Istanbul talks, it could have prevented another three years of meatgrinder. As during those talks Russia openly discussed getting troops back to pre-2022 border as possible option, and European alliance instead of NATO (i.e. no US troops and nukes in Europe) is also offer that is hard to ignore. So after some negotiation it might become a deal; sadly noone offered that.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because the idea of a European alliance is nonsense. NATO IS the European alliance. And NATO’s strategy for defending against Russia is a nuclear killchain with one critical position in Ukraine. What would a European alliance do? Not defend against Russia? Or defend against Russia in a different way? Would they do that while still in NATO or would they have to dismantle NATO first and then build this alliance?

      It’s nonsense. You can’t just make a new transnational military that is capable of defending against Russia by just saying “European Alliance”.

    • direwolf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      The difference is that Trump doesn’t seem interested defending Europe. The EU should use this to bargain with Putin regarding Ukraine.