0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agorace conditionsimagemessage-square86linkfedilinkarrow-up1881arrow-down125
arrow-up1856arrow-down1imagerace conditions0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agomessage-square86linkfedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoFun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
minus-squarenialv7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoI did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months ago I did say “general purpose”. I did say “fun fact”.
Fun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
I did say “fun fact”.