The facts are only relevant on a different subject. But introducing that new subject undermines the original subject and dilutes the initial statement even though it’s factually correct. Gas lighting. You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted. Of which in survived attempted murder fighting corruption in America. I have the legitimacy to criticize Putin.
You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted. Of which in survived attempted murder fighting corruption in America. I have the legitimacy to criticize Putin.
The facts are only relevant on a different subject. But introducing that new subject undermines the original subject and dilutes the initial statement even though it’s factually correct. Gas lighting. You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted. Of which in survived attempted murder fighting corruption in America. I have the legitimacy to criticize Putin.
The initial statement was nonsense, and it’s incredible that you keep doubling down on it.
The conclusion doesn’t follow the premise.
Big if true.