m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agoWikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive linksarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square85linkfedilinkarrow-up1492arrow-down111file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1481arrow-down1external-linkWikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive linksarstechnica.comm3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square85linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
original, saw this somewhere else too. ddos stuff. this one blames ru for archive.today mess. sounds about right. didn’ intend it to look like an announcement here. it kind of did. post based on ars story, apparently. who knows
minus-squareEm Adespoton@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoYes; the problem IPFS has is the same problem IPv6 has. The hash-in-a-URL solution can function cleanly in the background on top of what people already use.
minus-squareThe_Decryptor@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoIPFS has gateways though, so you can link to the latest version of a page which can be updated by the owner, or alternatively link to a specific revision of the page that is immutable and can’t be forged.
Yes; the problem IPFS has is the same problem IPv6 has.
The hash-in-a-URL solution can function cleanly in the background on top of what people already use.
IPFS has gateways though, so you can link to the latest version of a page which can be updated by the owner, or alternatively link to a specific revision of the page that is immutable and can’t be forged.