m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agoWikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive linksarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square85linkfedilinkarrow-up1492arrow-down111file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1481arrow-down1external-linkWikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive linksarstechnica.comm3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square85linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
original, saw this somewhere else too. ddos stuff. this one blames ru for archive.today mess. sounds about right. didn’ intend it to look like an announcement here. it kind of did. post based on ars story, apparently. who knows
minus-squarenull@lemmy.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoThe root of the problem is Wikipedia not having local snapshots leaves their articles vulnerable to eroding sources.
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoIs it reasonable for them to keep their own local snapshots? That’s not a trivial amount of work and data, particularly it it’s multimedia.
minus-squarenull@lemmy.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI think it’s a concerning issue affecting long-term viability of the platform. It’ll only get worse as time goes on and sources go offline.
The root of the problem is Wikipedia not having local snapshots leaves their articles vulnerable to eroding sources.
Is it reasonable for them to keep their own local snapshots?
That’s not a trivial amount of work and data, particularly it it’s multimedia.
I think it’s a concerning issue affecting long-term viability of the platform. It’ll only get worse as time goes on and sources go offline.