• Casterial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        55
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is old ASF, if you don’t think we can’t detect these then 😂😂😂

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          tech is tech. if it’s able to not be detected then it’s able to be not detected now.

          • Casterial@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is assuming one country is lagging behind their advancements. Most countries are finally catching up to our tech made in the 90s my dude.

              • Casterial@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Sure, in terms of infrastructure. Their military is still playing catch up and Venezuela and Iran both used Chinese defense tech.

                China is good at reverse engineering - it’s what they do, but temu tech isn’t the same as the original.

            • Redjard@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Modern version would be a silicon device not using any metal, that has a very low power mechanism (perhaps mechanical/chemical) that wakes it up much later where it then works as a bug. For example.

            • toofpic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Who “they”? Security services are not the hive, It’s not like everyone knows everything pr never misses anything. Or do you think it’s like a game where you unlock the “passive listening device countermeasures” technology and suddenly 100% bugs across the country are found and new bugs can’t be planted?

              • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                Or do you think it’s like a game where you unlock the “passive listening device countermeasures” technology

                Kinda, yes. Now that everyone knows how it works, and they will, because intelligence agencies share this stuff with their allies, it would become a lot harder to pull the same trick again.

        • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you know what ‘passive’ means? It’s a basically a mirror for a specific frequency. There’s no way to “detect” it other than tearing apart whatever it’s hidden in.

          The fact that it was made with 1960’s Soviet analog tech should tell you that China could plausibly make something better and smaller now.

          • layzerjeyt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There’s no way to “detect” it other than tearing apart whatever it’s hidden in.

            The Wikipedia article describes how they detected it at the time, with two different mathods. It was first stumbled onto accidentally then there was a focused attempt to pinpoint the source which was successful. Now that technique can be used any time a thorough check is required.

          • Bloefz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            It would certainly be detectable. You could do an X-ray, sweep the RF spectrum and see the energy disappear at the right frequency, things like that.

            They had that tech in the 60s too.

            Also when the bug was in operation it was definitely not passive. It was being fed by what must have been a really strong signal to power it, and transmitted the results back.

    • leoj@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      2 days ago

      I feel like it is entirely plausible to miss something when scanning, I believe it is extremely plausible to miss something when scanning an entire jet aircraft, regardless of the skills of the personnel involved.

        • leoj@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          2 days ago

          I feel like I had to have heard of this device before, but that article was a fascinating read - thank you!

          I think people still think of China as a second tier sometimes, but from what I have seen their technology is likely at least equal to ours, and I would imagine the West and China both surpass each other in different technological categories.

          • billy@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lol China is far superior to our tech. They get to manufacture everything we design. Then get to ponder on improvements. Not to mention their “students” in all our universities.

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        A jet has multiple integrated digital systems meaning it would be super easy to hide things within the wiring or on circuit boards, which is exactly what security professionals said when they accepted the plane - it could never be made truly safe without being gutted - but they didn’t listen.

      • zikzak025@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        By “the FBI scanned”, they probably mean “We told Kash Patel that there was a six pack of Miller hidden somewhere in the plane and let him have at it.”

        • leoj@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right? I was like “Faith in the FBI? Someone didn’t watch the Mens Hockey gold medal match…”