I’ve come across Red Hat allot lately and am wondering if I need to get studying. I’m an avid Ubuntu server user but don’t want to get stuck only knowing one distro. What is the way to go if i want to know as much as I can for use in real world situations.

  • Fafner@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    To tag onto this, what makes RHEL so special? Is it just the support you get from Red Hat or is there something about the distro that makes it so widely used?

    • gumpy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Beyond support agreements that others are mentioning, the huge requirement for the shop I work at (mid-scale high performance computing center) it’s 3rd party vendor package support. Mellanox/nvidia, whamcloud, slurm, vast, and on and on. Driver packages targeting rhel kernels are an industry standard offering if a vendor supports linux. That’s not always the case with Debian variants, for instance.

      Same with huge applications and proprietary compiler suites (think matlab and the intel compiler suite or OneAPI). These are hugely important packages for a number of shops.

      Don’t get me wrong, I can build against plenty of other distros but my vendors target rhel as a first class citizen for both build scripts and straight binary packaging.

    • TwinHaelix@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is 100% the support. Corporations pay big money to have experts on call to fix things fast when they break, and there’s basically no other player for that kind of model in the Linux space.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The default Linux image on AWS (Amazon Linux) is RPM-based; but the default image on Google Cloud currently appears to be Debian “bullseye” (the April 2023 release) with an option for “bookworm” (brand new this month). I’m not sure about Microsoft Azure but their docs suggest a Debian default as well.

    So that’s one impression. Knowing both dpkg/apt and rpm will serve you well.

    Major tech companies have their own internal distributions in their production datacenters, which focus much more on their specific needs. Any major tech company using Linux in datacenters will have an engineering team specifically building what they need.

  • nicman24@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i dont get why people do not just use debian. especially if they got their own it person / support

    • garam@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No certification and no support. Critical bug will be fixed faster in RHEL than Debian when come to Enterprise, very clear structure and powerful consultancy.

      Debian consultancy never near RHEL, that’s why they need to work hard on that, and make industry standard.

      Red Hat drive the industry standard for more than 20 years… That make every Corp lean to it, and it won’t dwindling soon… Unless other are making Debian standardized.

      Ubuntu tried it, still not even taking chunk I guess? Mostly Enterprise is RHEL/Clones.

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personal take: RHEL is a very high quality well integrated OS. Debian is a mess of community opinion all conflicting held together by outdated and poor tooling.

  • stewsters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been seeing a lot of alpine based containers recently. Used to see a lot of Ubuntu, debian, redhat.

    I think a lot of it depends on if you are spinning a lot of containers up.

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Started with RHEL years ago, migrated to CentOS to get away from the license fees etc. Have since moved to Amazon Linux since we subsequently migrated everything to AWS.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of my clients were using CentOS. Not sure what’ll happen next now that Red Hat killed CentOD.

    • garam@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mission critical server mostly are RHEL or EL Clone or Fedora or it’s derivative… If you combine even Azure nowdays, Microsoft Linux is derived from Fedora, same as Amazon Linux, and others… Debian are covering some part, but mostly hobbyist, or SME, and mostly non critical, as they don’t have standard across, even on their https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Extended and https://www.debian.org/consultants/

      apt also bad when you got to dowgrade package when something mess up, and get messy with dpkg… :'(

      So I quite doubt if it’s production env, mostly go with EL. I do know some company use Ubuntu/Debian, but it’s quite few…

      If Ubuntu/Debian want to shape Industries, and kick out RHEL, they need to have standard, and better consultancy than RHEL. I hope so that they could grow and make market competitive, but for now it isn’t sadly.

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Debian needs to focus more on automation if they want more penetration in the enterprise. Debian feels made for human admins logging in and managing things old school style which is fine for a few machines. Modern enterprises use Ansible etc and need highly functional non-interactive ways to install and configure etc. Preseed and Apt leave something to be desired here.

  • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu, RedHat, AWS Linux, Arch. Honestly distros in production are pretty similar since they’re all headless and pretty pared-down. If you just know the logistics of a few package managers and init systems you’ll be good.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m surprised to see arch on your list, I know everything runs in containers now but arch seems way too unstable O_o

      By unstable I don’t mean “buggy”, but “you will have to adapt to new major version of package XXX or you can’t fetch updates anymore, so no security patches anymore”.

  • Daeraxa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not Linux but there are still a of Unix System V systems out there too. AIX, Solaris and HP-UX. Harder to learn as very much not open source software (although there is the Illumos project with distros like OpenIndiana).

      • Daeraxa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately AIX in particular is very much still in use in my industry. Its slowly being phased out but is very much still there.

  • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I once worked in for a small publishing company years ago, circa 2005, where they used CentOS on the desktop and server environments. Deploying a new desktop was as simple as using kickstart. They had their infrastructure down to a science.