• stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    LOL this is not a hypothetical. there are already bad apps in the regular app store. now you have two.

    also Android has nothing on the security posture of Apple.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      So you admit having a walled garden doesn’t protect you from malicious apps, but you still want on to…protect you from malicious apps?

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I just want you to envision a moment where the opportunity for two bad things happening is worse than one.

        Honestly I really don’t get the anger here except that everyone has decided that opening the floodgates is the only way forward.

        • Ruinam@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          You really need to explain this to me. Assuming apple provides a security benefit, then the same benefit still exist if you do not use the sideloading, except for apps that do not want to get checked by apple. But you only want apps that are secure also that are checked. How is the ability to get (maybe) less secure apps a danger to you, given thst you will still use the app store.