• eraclito@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I believe the question is missing somehow the main points… even if the switch cost the double or triple there are several strategic advantages that should take into account:

    • use Linux allow to growth the number of high specialized professional workers, investing on local resources;
    • invest in a local network of specialized companies, instead of financing the silicon valley with ours public money;
    • be less dependent by abroad technologies, get a major control of the system used;

    These are few that come to my mind…

    What would be really interesting to know is the percentage of the investment that stay in the region/country following a linux-based/opensource IT infrastructure for public bodies vs the current closed M$|OSX paradigm.

    • magikmw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree. A lot of profits wouldn’t be cash saved, for one taxes that you aren’t losing to multinational corporations headquartered in Ireland or Cyprus.

      Cybersecurity costs would also likely go down due to most malware being exploited isn’t targeting desktop Linux.

      • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        About the malware thing. Won’t the Linux use increasing in organizations give incentive for attackers to make malwares targeting linux? It’s not like we’re malware free, it’s just that average user is informed enough and there is low use of linux making it not worth as much to target desktop users.

        • magikmw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure. For a while tho, it would be easier to avoid sweeping ransomware incidents.