In the current spectrum, how much should one spend to get the best value? I know everyone has a different taste and budget. But analysing the current trend of smartphone culture could give a bit of insight into spending wisely.

  • Tolstoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I prefer older used flagships. It’s hardly depends on the use case though. I don’t care about camera, games or what so ever. Phone, messenger and maybe a handful of apps for social and homelab. So for me it’s max 100€

    • 9715698@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is getting to be a better and better option with Google and Samsung promising more than 3yrs of OS updates.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Meh, OS updates are overrated, especially now that Android is so much better with battery life.

        I have a phone running Android 9… And it’s super fast. And if I switch it to Lineage/Divest, it’s even faster.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Under $300 IMO, that gets you a used flagship model from 1-2 years ago that isn’t too much different from the current models.

    • Blaze@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      The issue is that currently the 1-2 years used flagships have a lot of issues

      • Samsung S21 and S22 have bad batteries, not even talking about Exynos if OP is based in the EU
      • Pixel 6 and 7 have bad connectivity and also some battery issues
      • OnePlus aren’t what they used to be

      That reduces quite a lot what should be the main source of used flagships

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use apple phones, but i usually run 3-6 years behind.

    Currently have an 11 , I think they are up to 14. I don’t really see what the new models do.

    Still the thick end of 250 quid.

    I don’t know what people who spend 1000 tell themselves.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s funny, I bought an s9 plus at launch and was recently “kicking tires” thinking of upgrading.

      Looked at the recent crop and from my judgement, they’re about 15% better than this one for the things that matter to me. For only $2,000 CAD

      Looks like I’ll be having the screen and battery replaced and keeping this for another 7 years.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If you don’t care about the cameras…

        Nowadays that’s probably the biggest most worthwhile improvement you’ll see.

        Edit: The difference between your S9 and an S23 or S24 would be pretty dramatic.

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I tend to limit myself to max €100 per expected year of use. It’s just a phone to me. My Nokia 6.1 was €300 and is still working. Main requirement is the availability of an alternatuve rom for it.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yup, I also budget 100 euros per year. I tend to buy phones around 400 euros myself, they need to last 4 years before I buy a new one.

      Currently on a Poco F2 Pro with LineageOS, still needs to live for a couple of years.

  • huginn@feddit.it
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Value is subjective.

    When the Pixel 7 came out it was incredibly good value for money. Buttery smooth, high quality cameras, best quality android experience $500. Unbeatable, and made the A series not worth it that year.

    This year I’d probably say the pixel 7a.

  • rambos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    250€ because I spent that much 18 months ago and still super happy

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, just find a phone that was cutting edge 3-4 years ago. get it used off amazon or wherever for like $200-300. I bought my Samsung Galaxy S10 like 4 years ago, it still runs amazingly well.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    My general rule of thumb when getting a cheap device:

    • want the cheapest device even if it has dubious ads and tracking: xiaomi
    • want a relatively cheap device and ok with first party ads/promotion and tracking: low end Samsung

    The thing with cheap device is it’s not guaranteed to have 3rd party roms available, and even if one exists, it’s not guaranteed how long they’ll be maintained, so it’s not a factor when I’m trying to get a very cheap device.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Best to look for current rom development on a device first. The Lineage device list is a big part of why I’m now going to Pixel.

      Generally you get roms on the newer devices, and the older they get, development drops off.

      Also depends on the device. If it was a flagship, it tends to have a longer rom lifespan because the hardware has a longer usability curve.

      The Lineage device list is interesting in that you see which devices are (generally) more usable long term by the development cycle.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You can spend barely a whole minute during first time setup to make Samsung phones not give you any ad and remove most tracking that has no direct use for the end user.

  • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I typically buy a new flagship on sale and hold it for 4-5 years. Buying a new $300 phone means you start with mid-range performance and go down from there over time. This means you’ll either have a really slow phone for the last year or two or you’ll need to replace it sooner.

    • TwanHE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Depends on what phone you get and where it cuts the corners. The Snapdragon 845 in my Poco F1 is still plenty fast 4 years later. The camera is still respectable even today.

      The plastic body and shitty LCD screen aren’t great, but that was already there when I got it.

    • bighatchester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I got a couple Galaxy a20 like phones (can’t remember all the names) and they would break very easily, one fell from my pocket onto my shoe and the screen cracked . I eventually got a galaxy s21 and this phone has been dropped on pavement a bunch of times. Dropped in water , butter chicken etc and still is just fine. Other than that I actually don’t notice much difference in performance . I bought my s21 directly from Best Buy and it was almost $1000 Canadian.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The best value smartphone on the market is the Fairphone 5. 70 euros per year, amortized over 10 years. Compare with a cheap, slower, but more expensive to repair Samsung A14, which would only last 2 years before the battery starts dying, and cost 85 euros per year over that time.

  • TwanHE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Somewhere between 300-500 Prioritising getting a decent chipset over the rest of the features, because having all the gimmicks doesn’t matter if the phone feels slow after a few years of updates.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would say the opposite.

      The chipset is no longer important unless you’re heavily into smartphone games. Even a mid-range chipset from 2 years ago will run standard tasks just fine these days. Smartphone requirements have basically plateaued for a few years now.

      Prioritize just about everything OTHER then the chipset, depending on what you really use the phone for. Cameras, battery life, screen quality, memory capacity… Prioritize chipset only if you’re gaming.

      • TwanHE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I dont really game on my phone but my parents both got the Samsung a51 shortly after i got my Poco F1. And nowadays the a51 takes a while to load basically anything while the F1 still feels pretty snappy.

        Chipset also plays a huge part in the battery life and camera experience.

        For me I only start looking for a new phone when i get annoyed by how slow my current phone feels, I’m not saying you should get a shitty phone just because it has a good chip, it just really helps it not feel old in a few years.