• Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      AI can’t be the last word in what gets marked for misconduct etc., however using it as a screening tool for potentially problematic moments in a law enforcement officer’s encounters would be useful. It’s an enormous task to screen through those hours upon hours of video and probably prohibitively expensive for humans to work through.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Need to be certain the false negative rate is near zero though, or important events could be missed, and with AI its nearly impossible to say that with certainty.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          so we should just drop the good in pursuit of perfect?

          ai is just an additional tool to be applied based on its efficacy. the better the tooling gets, the more we can trust its results. but no one…

          no one

          is expecting ai to be perfect, and to be trusted 100%.

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is this the kind of thing anyone could be happy about?

      Cops reviewing themselves, we know how that works out.

      1. Cops being reviewed by shitty AI.
      2. ???
      3. ???
      4. wtf
      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Then again, when the police union doesn’t like something, makes me wonder what it’s exposing about them…