• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not actually true, so don’t worry.

    Edit. If you’re going to reply with an “actually” comment, don’t. Just go back to Reddit.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is actually true though. Just the FAA’s definition of “near collision” is much much looser than what a lay person would think.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean it is true, it’s just “near collisions” has a broad definition in terms of air safety. Things that are very low risk or potential problems that were simply resolved before they grew are still recorded.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. The top comments already explain why the article is wrong.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He is just worried that HIS “actually” wouldn’t stand out as nicely if someone added second one…