For a old laptop with Intel atom processor and I think 2gb ram.

  • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not worth it. Ram is dirt cheap, you can get 8gb for like $30. For $150-$200, you can find an used Thinkpad that will perform 1000x better.

    I would only use such a machine for playing with old software like Windows 2000 or XP, old Linux distros.

  • Mo5560@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my personal experience void linux ran the smoothest on all my old laptops (compared to stuff like arch and antiX, I defo didn’t try everything).

  • CAPSLOCKFTW@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Might be overkill (or underkill), but Tiny Core Linux is the most lightweight I know. While having an up to date kernel (6.1.2) and glibc (2.3.6).

    What are the minimum requirements? An absolute minimum of RAM is 46mb. TC won’t boot with anything less, no matter how many terabytes of swap you have. Microcore runs with 28mb of ram. The minimum cpu is i486DX (486 with a math processor). A recommended configuration: Pentium 2 or better, 128mb of ram + some swap

  • Maxxy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Peppermint on my garbage laptop and it made it usable again.

  • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, I’ll just mention that it all means nothing as soon as you open a browser window. Then all your RAM is gonna be used up anyway.

      • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, play your youtube videos on Lynx.

        We all know that’s one of the main things people use browsers for, that’s not work, these days. ;)

            • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you just drag and drop into mpv or how does it work? With youtube seemingly trying to prevent the use of adblockers, I have to look for alternatives ahead of time.

              • smpl@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I must admit I copy paste the link to the terminal, so it’s not a seamless experience. I don’t watch enough videos to have done anything other than write a wrapper script with my preferred settings for youtube videos and to convert invidious links to youtube links.

                I just tried running mpv --idle=yes --force-window=yes from the terminal and drag a youtube link to the window. It plays like it should. yt-dlp is installed locally for my user in ~/.local/bin and that directory is appended to the PATH environment variable. I also have yt-dlp symlinked to youtube-dl for mpv to pick it up. I guess what’s missing is my preferred options for youtube videos, which I could set up in ~/.config/mpv/mpv.conf. Everytime some site breaks, you run yt-dlp -U to update and cross your fingers.

  • _e____b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you enjoy using older, less powerful computers, it’s important to find a Linux distribution that can accommodate the limited resources. While extremely stripped-down distributions like Tinycore might seem appealing, they often lack the functionality and ease of use that come with more comprehensive distributions.

    Instead, I would recommend learning how to use a window manager and forgoing a desktop manager. This approach allows you to maintain a lightweight system without sacrificing too much functionality.

    When it comes to choosing a distribution, some are more bloated than others, so it’s crucial to find one that offers a degree of flexibility during the installation process. In this regard, Debian is a great choice.

    You can install Debian as a server, which will provide a minimal base system. From there, you can install a window manager and only the essential packages you need. This way, you can keep your system lean and efficient, perfect for older, low-powered computers.

  • HerbalGamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know those Acer mini laptops from around 2010 back when tablets weren’t really a thing?

    Linux Mint runs on those bad boys.

  • hitagi (ani.social)@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    antiX I’ve used this before on an old laptop (also an atom and 2gb RAM) and it’s very lightweight. It just doesn’t have defaults that I prefer but if you tweak it enough, it should be fine.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard Debian and Alpine are good lightweight distros

    I think most distros will run fine on most hardware though (please correct me if I’m wrong) it’s the software you run on it (as in, going with a GNOME desktop environment is going to be much more demanding than xfce for example)