Communist Capi ☭ 🇵🇸@midwest.social to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhat If: Signal Was Part of the Fediverse?signal.orgexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWhat If: Signal Was Part of the Fediverse?signal.orgCommunist Capi ☭ 🇵🇸@midwest.social to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredismalnow@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNot doubting that pushy idiots are going to pushy idiot, but I think you’ve strawmanned the actual reason hard enough. Most people who want it back don’t need, want, or understand why secure messaging exists. Here’s the simple facts: SMS is not secure, or private. Signal is for secure, private comms. As mildly inconvenient as it is, Signal explained their reasoning in great detail, and I happen to agree: There should never have been an insecure option on a secure messaging app.
Not doubting that pushy idiots are going to pushy idiot, but I think you’ve strawmanned the actual reason hard enough.
Most people who want it back don’t need, want, or understand why secure messaging exists.
Here’s the simple facts:
SMS is not secure, or private.
Signal is for secure, private comms.
As mildly inconvenient as it is, Signal explained their reasoning in great detail, and I happen to agree: There should never have been an insecure option on a secure messaging app.