• Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    An advertising company is telling everyone their browser (they designed to better serve eyeballs to their advertising customers) is not a privacy nightmare…

    Next up a slaughterhouse releases its new “Animal welfare policy”.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, this is “bad”, but I think it’s objectively better than 3rd party cookies. I don’t care either way.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Every single browser (including Chrome) has already agreed to remove support for third party cookies, and virtually all of them have already done so (by default anyway - you can enable them if you have compatibility issues).

        That’s not something we should be comparing this new feature to.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can we please use “scarequotes” whenever ‘Google’ and ‘Privacy’ are in the same sentence, please?

    Edit: even if we need a “Good bot” to facillitate, that would be equal parts amusing and helpful

    I wonder how they “privacy preserve” you once you hit Pornhub.

  • Solaris1789@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Don’t worry, i’ll make sure they don’t spy on you… Because only I can”

  • Asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They release web integrity drm shit and now try to protect our privacy? google’s being funny.