No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific::NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific.

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    your comment basically confirms you did not read my previous comment where i shared an example that nasa disclosed with a link. there is even a non blurry video of one…

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have many documented UAPs that have no explanation. That’s what he means by “real UAP.”

        “No evidence of aliens” is not scientist for “no” here because we do have an unexplainable thing that, in the set of plausible explanations, includes “aliens.” NASA is saying there is no proof it is alien, so the entire set of plausible unexplained reasons is still in play

        The way science works is we will slowly chip away at what that set contains.

        Now stop being a dick.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then why bother with the whole uap shit to begin with?

          You don’t see congressional hearings about “unexplained ancient phenomenon” for archeology sites or " unexplained underwater fornication" for unknown marine mating behaviors.

          Of course there are some things that are unknown. But uap really mean “aliens” and we know it.

          I’ll stop being a dick when “ufologists” stop making a big deal about every fuzzy photo they can find.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because UAPs represent everything from legitimate national security risks to funded programs with little or no oversight.

            You’re so bent out of shape with “NOT ALIENS OMG BRO” that you’re not seeing the real-world impact.

            You could just assume that actual, professional scientists know more than you do.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You could just assume that actual, professional scientists know more than you do.

              Oh, they do. And they say it’s not aliens.

      • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not “my term” you can find the meaning of real in the dictionary.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s wrong with you? I’m asking you to explain what you mean so that I don’t misunderstand and misrepresent what your think. And this is how you reply? Forget it, you’re not worth further replies.