Depends, but you can get a 4k 55" Samsung for under $600.
Depends, but you can get a 4k 55" Samsung for under $600.
You want a “commercial display”. They are dumb TVs for signage and whatnot. You won’t be getting the cutting edge display technology, but you still get a great display and no smart functions.
My pi-hole was getting hammered by an LG smart TV.(Phrasing)
That TV no longer gets internet privileges and I definitely won’t be buying an LG again. I strayed from Sony and regretted it across the board.
In America, you “have to” due to government regulation(IRS wants their cut of the tendies).
Check with your friend or the manufacturers instructions if your friend doesn’t know exactly. The light may be too far away or too close for what is best for those plants.
Are you sure the light is at the right height?
It’s 2024, madness rules these times. Witness the fall of Rome, heralded by a blue “e”.
I’m not saying we should have gulags, but if we did, I have some suggestions for permanent residency.
Your calves are defined and your bank account can barely hold a comma?
Sounds like a successful product launch, good enough to justify a second product in the line.
The rich flexing inspires desire. People don’t want a Lamborghini because it is the best car, they want a Lamborghini because they envy people who have one.
Valid point, but have you considered “Apple”?
Sure, it still won’t have genuine utility for everyday use, but it will have a rabid fandom who want to be cool to the point of justifying overpriced hardware with weak arguments that reduce to “because I just lile Apple.”
They aren’t stranded because there is the emergency capsule to get them back.
Classic corporate doublespeak and half truths.
Good thing he stopped using it a few weeks ago.
You asked if headlights emit IR because you didn’t think they do, they emit IR.
IR is heat, so headlights produce a a lot of IR. Laser headlights emit less IR with the visible light, but radiate heat.
Do you still use Myspace?
That would work if they had a stable business model and produced something everybody needed or wanted, like diapers or alcohol. Their entire business model requires they keep users engaged and user count growing.
People will leave Meta the more Meta tries to make more off of a stagnant userbase, which will death spiral.
It is more that they are not growing, and that means dying in their business model. By not reporting an accurate metric of user engagement, they are hiding the stagnation or loss. Background logins from apps are likely also hiding the real picture of user engagement. Without active user engagement they lose their revenue, data harvesting and advertising.
So there are signs that they are in a downturn, which will lead to irrelevance and failure.
Absolutely, they need a better filter and on-board processing. It is like they are just gathering and transmitting for external processing instead of cherry picking the data matching an action that is previously trained and sending it as an output.
I’m guessing they kept the processing power low because of heat or power availability, they wanted to have that quiet “sleek” puck instead of a brick with a fanned heatsink. Maybe they should consider a jaunty hat to hide the hardware.
Gathering all the data available has future utility, but their data transmission bottleneck makes that capability to gather data worthless. They are trying to leap way too far ahead with too high of a vanity prioritization and getting bit for it, about par for the course with an Elon project.
I wouldn’t trust it to tell me if something is or isn’t a banana.