Please do not change the name.
There’s nothing wrong with it whatsoever. ~ I feel seen (with my gimpy walk), with that homonym out there. It’s a strong positive.
Also, what an ugly book-burning history-rewriting miscrediting to try hush an advocacy of freedom, when [ironically] that freedom’s right there, availing you the solution (that does not seek to impose any doubleplus goodspeak), in that you can just fork it, and rename it, yourself, if that’s the issue you have with it.
… Also… I’ve never heard it called GNU Imp. Gimp, or GNU Image Manipulation Program, or the gimp. That’s just silly. … And why’s Imp considered an improvement? What’s the benefit? What itch would it scratch?







It’s free software. You’re assured the 4 freedoms. Put up or hack up. If you want GIMP the same but with another name, that’s a fairly easy fork to make. You do not need to reaffirm your dis-empowerment, wishing on eventuality.
Why’s it a shame it has the name it has?
It’s a great name. It’s fun. It’s whimsical. It’s practical. It says exactly what it is. Where’s the shame?
And speaking as someone with several ailments that give me a gimpy walk, I feel seen, having the already-homonymous word gimp extended to yet another meaning. … Is the objection to the name coming from those who are yet to comprehend the concept of homonyms and extend that comprehension more broadly to things they’d not prior considered to be homonyms?