• 1 Post
  • 177 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyztoLinux@lemmy.mlPrinting on Linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Recently ran into an issue with Endeavour OS where the built in printer program would give errors when trying to add my network ecotank printer.

    Tried using cups terminal and it worked the first time, and is still working weeks later.

    So some of the GUI printer apps that distros ship with have issues apparently, but I don’t know the extent of it.








  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzto3DPrinting@lemmy.worldSetting up a printer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I had similar printing issues with some filaments, due to heat creep. The printing would start ok on mine, but after the printer had been running awhile it would print like that. In my case heat was travelling up the hot end and Bowden tube, which was causing printing issues after a certain amount of time had passed. Some filaments were more sensitive about this than others, my cheap plain filaments and my multicolor filaments wouldn’t print well, but medium to high quality plain filaments would print fine.

    There are a lot of things that can contribute to heat creep, I ended up replacing my hot end and Bowden tube, and lowered my print temperature some.

    220° is pretty high, I would try to figure out why it won’t print below that temperature and see what you can do to bring that down. See if that fixes it.











  • There’s nothing stopping you from going to youtube, listening to a bunch of hit country songs there, and using that inspiration to write a “hit country song about getting your balls caught in a screen door”. That music was free to access, and your ability to create derivative works is fully protected by copyright law.

    So if that’s what the AI is doing, then it would be fully legal if it was a person. The question courts are trying to figure out is if AI should be treated like people when it comes to “learning” and creating derivative works.

    I think there are good arguments to both sides of that issue. The big advantage of ruling against AI having those rights is that it means that record labels and other rights holders can get compensation for their content being used. The main disadvantage is that high cost barriers to training material will kill off open-source and small company AI, guaranteeing that generative AI is fully controlled by tech giant companies like Google, Microsoft, and Adobe.

    I think the best legal outcome is one that attempts to protect both: companies and individuals below a certain revenue threshold (or other scale metrics) can freely train on the open web, but are required to track what was used for training. As they grow, there will be different tiers where they’re required to start paying for the content their model was trained on. Obviously this solution needs a lot of work before being a viable option, but I think something similar to this is the best way to both have competition in the AI space and make sure people get compensated.