You right lmaooo. That’s funny, I guess I should say oldest democracy with real world power.

Lmao. Cite them sources or me saying Trump blows maggoty cum all over Melania is literally as true as that statement.

If inciting an attack on the capital and destabilizing the worlds oldest democracy doesn’t immediately discount Trump from your voting decisions then you’re braindead lol. Imagine trying to argue past that, despite 9 years of existing with Trump as a political figure.

This NPR article really talked around that detail. It was boring af and ended abruptly.

I feel like this vague statement applies to every religion, as you wouldn’t be following said religion if you didn’t believe it to be “the answer” to life.

As the other guy said though the state of Israel came about from Zionism, which is a fundamentalist sect of Judaism but doesn’t represent all Jews.

I was surprised to see Robert Evans as a rolling stone writer. I love his podcasts. Article was a great read.

The stream isn’t always consistent and I ain’t got the patience to clean that shit up. Sittings easier.

I saved that thread. Massive respect for keeping us all more informed.

Absolutely love the link dump. More posts need to be like this honestly.

peer reviewed properly

Is the important bit here. The timeline from that Wikipedia article shows it was published in 2005 and work disproving it’s claim came around in 2006.

If a scientists work is retracted it really kills any more funding they receive. They use examples like the DRBG one as what not to be.

I know someone in this field and sent him this article. He said the “NIST isn’t being transparent” claim isn’t true

https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=927303 https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2020/NIST.IR.8309.pdf https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=934458

He also responded with “of course the NSA would try and mess with it, but if it’s peer reviewed properly I don’t see how they would be successful”

Nah I posted a response review of a book that someone recommended which was bad and had a lot of misinformation about Pitbulls.

Oh man you should publish your study with your n=1. I’m sure it will gain traction.

I mention huskies because despite your comment there a lot of huskies in shelters because people can’t meet the standard care requirements for the breed.

You wouldn’t get articles like this if all that mattered were individual traits: https://rescuedoghome.com/huskies-in-shelters/amp/

God you people are stupid lol

Lots of claims here with no evidence lol. Do you also believe the earth is flat because someone wrote an article about it once?

Looks like you just learned what quotation marks are too lmao

This is honestly a badly written article. I have a problem with the final statement of the abstract this article links:

Thus, dog breed is generally a poor predictor of individual behavior and should not be used to inform decisions relating to selection of a pet dog.

If you have a working dog breed, you need to maintain certain a level of activity or mental stimulation in order to keep that dog healthy and not bored. Many huskies are put in shelters because people cannot meet their energy demands. It’s disingenuous to disregard the breed’s physicality and how that affects their individual behaviors.

This article also states biddability was the trait linked most to breed which is an important factor in choosing a domesticated animal.