![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
44·
9 months agoI think you’re technically correct in this instance.
I think you’re technically correct in this instance.
Yes it seems they want copyright when it suits them and not when it doesn’t.
Getting hit by a paywall to read this article, maybe made the point better than the article!
They are led by by the “protect paedos” and “create terrorism” gang. Unfortunately most people are too dumb or disinterested to look beyond the popularist slogans.
Ironic if most UK users just start using VPNs to access content no longer available in UK.
Probably means she’s believing what they told her!
As for the Tories I think this is the ideal extension to their snoopers charter.
Unless you work in recruitment or porn…
Nah I think they just got a judge who gives a shit about humanity…
The Section of the Public Order Act 1986 lays out rules for how police can control “public assemblies” – defined as a gathering of two or more people in a public place.
Police officers can issue them if they “reasonably believe” that the protest “may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community”.
It can also do so if it belives the purpose of the organisers is to “intimidate others”.
What surprised me was this is the older legislation. I thought they would use the newer anti protest legislation which even legislates against a protest being too noisy.