@xerazal
most of you don’t. the real world isn’t rainbows and unicorn color farts.
calls me a jackass and then proceeds to somehow confuse 1 man with an organisation. nice job. if this is the best you can come up with then you are NOT doing yourself any favors.
you show me 1 special ops org in the world that can eliminate hamas by itself. there isn’t one. anywhere. that requires these things called “armies”. which have well equipped soldiers with support units, lines of communication and resupply, things you bleeding heart armchair wannabe generals don’t know about.
and btw, look up the definition of genocide, how the term has been used historically, and then understand why it doesn’t apply here. because there is a difference in scale, motivation, and outcome. and i’ll ask this of all those who spout this shit…if its a genocide then why aren’t israeli’s invading west bank? and no, a few raids and strikes doesn’t count.
which all says its a campaign against hamas. which has little power in west bank.
try again.
no. i would say to take a look at who’s been leading it and what their agenda is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Human_Rights_Council#Accusations_of_bias_against_Israel
Speaking at the IDC’s Herzliya Conference in Israel in January 2008, Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen criticized the actions of the Human Rights Council actions against Israel. “At the United Nations, censuring Israel has become something of a habit, while Hamas’s terror is referred to in coded language or not at all. The Netherlands believes the record should be set straight, both in New York and at the Human Rights Council in Geneva”, Verhagen said.[146]
At UNHRC’s opening session in February 2011, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticized the council’s “structural bias” against the State of Israel: “The structural bias against Israel – including a standing agenda item for Israel, whereas all other countries are treated under a common item – is wrong. And it undermines the important work we are trying to do together.”[147]
In March 2012, the UNHRC was criticized for facilitating an event in the UN Geneva building featuring a Hamas politician. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu castigated the UNHRC’s decision stating, “He represents an organization that indiscriminately targets children and grown-ups, and women and men. Innocents – is their special favorite target”. Israel’s ambassador to the UN Ron Prosor denounced the speech stating that Hamas was an internationally recognized terrorist organization that targeted civilians. “Inviting a Hamas terrorist to lecture to the world about human rights is like asking Charles Manson to run the murder investigation unit at the NYPD”, he said.[148]
The United States urged UNHRC in Geneva to stop its anti-Israel bias. It took particular exception to the council’s Agenda Item 7, under which at every session, Israel’s human rights record is debated. No other country has a dedicated agenda item. The US Ambassador to UNHRC Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe said that the United States was deeply troubled by the “Council’s biased and disproportionate focus on Israel.” She said that the hypocrisy was further exposed in the Golan Heights resolution that was advocated by the Syrian regime at a time when it was murdering its own citizens.[149]