I think you’re overstating the significance of those edits and comments.
I think you’re overstating the significance of those edits and comments.
Same for Voyager, Thunder, and Jerboa. Can’t work out which one to go to.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
How so?
You mean the paid awards in September they just got rid of because Fuck Users?
Surprised this was made public so soon to be honest.
It seems like the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians was the only goal, the whole time.
Yeah, using compact.
You guys have got ads on Sync? I haven’t and I’m still using the free version.
I wouldn’t recommend Sync at this stage anymore as the lone developer is gone completely AFK for months.
Despite charging £100 for a premium app tier…
Do yourself a favour and use something else. At some point I’ll try out Connect.
The trouble you guys face is Trump is worse.
Just on Israel-Palestine alone, Trump is the person that recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city. If that isn’t informative about his attitude about the situation…
Reasons not to pay £100 for Ultra: this.
LBC is generally just shit rage-bait and controversy farming.
They don’t do journalism.
It’s the Torygraph, you’re not missing much.
The prefix and suffix stars, man…
I found one source! It was sponsored by the British Tobacco Company, lol.
Nah, it’s difficult to find recent data of it - because I get the impression from the papers I have found - the idea was thrown out as a marketing ploy in the 50s and has no significant impact on risk.
Instead it just makes cigarettes worse for the environment - because the filters don’t decompose.
As far as I understand, this isn’t quite right (unless it’s changed recently).
If A defeds B, then A no longer sends new posts to B, accepts comments or posts from B users, or receives new posts from B. Any comments from B users on A’s old posts (made before defederation) are no longer acknowledged by A.
I think A users can still interact with B’s posts, but then I haven’t seen any beehaw users in forever. So perhaps not?
C can obviously still interact with both A and B posts normally. On posts from C, both A and B users can still interact.
So, in short defederation creates a hard wall preventing interaction between A and B. The only way A and B users can interact is on C.
It’s unfortunate as beehaw would have benefitted from a uni-directional defederation (i.e. preventing .world users from posting on beehaw, but not preventing .beehaw users from posting on .world. Unfortunately, it’s both.)
Cool, I’ll give this a try too.
Sounds interesting. I’ll take a look, thanks.
I don’t know if my reading comprehension is poor or the Independent managed to write everything but what Scholz said (in both this article and the self-referenced article within)…
Can someone please clarify? What intelligence did Scholz apparently breach?