It gives an example:

For example, with the phrase “My favorite tropical fruits are __.” The LLM might start completing the sentence with the tokens “mango,” “lychee,” “papaya,” or “durian,” and each token is given a probability score. When there’s a range of different tokens to choose from, SynthID can adjust the probability score of each predicted token, in cases where it won’t compromise the quality, accuracy and creativity of the output.

So I suppose with a larger text, if all lists of things are “LLM Sorted”, it’s an indicator.

That’s probably not the only thing, if it can detect a bunch of these indicators, there’s a higher likelihood it’s LLM text

Yea, I agree.

Also what’s the point now? At least a couple years ago we got a pretty cool t-shirt. Now we’re just getting a digital badge…?

40% of you are getting paid for this…? 🫠

No, not some internal company, just Microsoft being Microsoft. So all Windows pipelines. They also have Linux based pipelines so not completely all pipelines.

But given that a lot of people build dotnet stuff on Azure, the ‘windows-latest’ image is usually the default. So a lot of pipelines

That’s not a Discord bot, it’s a Slack RSS App / RSS subscription.

Event Source: https://status.dev.azure.com/_event/543117809

It’s pretty useful ‘for work’ because occasionally you’ll get notifications when parts of infra might be down (like your build server)

It’s more the fault of the implementation and documentation.

Yea sure. Though it’s slightly XMLs fault for allowing that kinda implementations. Every random thing is in it’s own obscure namespace with 20 levels of nested objects in different namespaces, and if you get anything wrong it barely explains what’s wrong, and just refuses to work.

It’s mostly WCFs fault. I just automatically associate XML with nightmare flashbacks of implementing WCF stuff

Uh-huh… ever tried to integrate with a poorly implement WCF service? Like communication from a Java service to a dotnet service through a WSDL?

I’ll take a json API over XML any day

At some I added logging to a thread pool, when it gave up on child-threads, it would be logging things like

“Child 123 is being aborted”

Not the best of phrasing for people that didn’t know what that was about…

That laser at the end should have been Java Technology™ ;

You point it at anything, and end up with a huge dumpster fire… Sounds like Java to me

Whatever you do, don’t use G2A and other similar CD key reseller websites

For indie games, sure, I always just buy those legit.

But some EA / Ubisoft game; I rather pay $5 on G2A than risk accidentally downloading a malware infected crack

Where does it end though? It’s a bit like infinite craft - but instead of combining resources you’d have to find an inverse for every emoji

It’s a bit weird how that actually works though…

“Which of these pictures are traffic lights?”

I’d hope with all the self-driving-(ish) cars coming out, any AI like that should be able to identify a traffic light, right?

I’ve started to prefer option A to be honest.

In C# I’m using Verify - So I prefer to just use Verify(state); and compare the entire state against a json saved state, instead of manually verifying every individual property

Me: building a fluent interface framework…
I already support a WrapperOf<T, T, T, T>
User: Can I have a WrapperOf<T, T, T, T, T> because I’m doing something weird?
Me: *sigh* god-damnit. You’re right but I still hate it.

O(n)? More Like Oh(No)

Right… well clearly I have clicked all the links, and read all the things, and I still don’t understand it. “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

So assume in good faith, assume I have absolutely no idea what the problem even is due of my own stupidity. So ELI5 and give a synopsis of the problem.

Did you stop reading or are you intentionally trying to phrase it as if the universities won’t do anything? […]
It doesn’t seem like you’re even trying to make a good faith argument.

My first sentence and first 4 words are “So what’s stopping them?”. So did you stop reading before that - or what are you even arguing about, and where is your ‘good faith’? You’re arguing about meta-nonsense without answering

What’s stopping them? What do they even need from “federation” or “ActivityPub” to just build this?

Hmm, I’m thinking - We should place a bunch properties and just name them something like "${username}" - "${password}" and variations of that, and see we can “find/replace” cross-site script them into sending their bots details

So what’s stopping them? Universities have internship programs and internal projects. In a university team of 4 people doing projects, 63x4 252 students could be assigned to a project to build this.

But

The french open science committee (CoSO) is indeed interested in the ActivityPub implementation in GitLab

Good phrasing. They are “interested in the ActivityPub implementation” not “interested in the implementing ActivityPub” - so who gives a shit what a bunch of universities are interested in

Removed by mod