Thank a christian for this.

Eh, you don’t need a gun necessarily to help out, see Desmond Doss.

By the end of its first day, Mirai had infected over 65,000 IoT devices. By its second day, Mirai already accounted for half of all Internet telnet scans observed by our collective set of honeypots, as shown in the figure above. At its peak in November 2016 Mirai had infected over 600,000 IoT devices.

And that’s just 1 botnet out of many.

Imagine non-network wrench situation:

“The FAA has grounded all Boeing 737 Max 9 jets today after a massive decompression event occurred on Alaska Airlines at 16,000 ft. The door plug blew out of the jet at altitude. United Airlines has reported, after inspection, loose bolts the door plug of several of its Boeing 737 Max 9 jets as it continues to inspect every one if its 79 jets in its fleet.”

What’s the ratio of boeing door decompressions to IoT devices being hacked?

Or execs.

You’re using HTTPS, do you have child porn?

If they’re technically inclined enough to run an installer and log in to google/apple, then they can do it, or you can do it for them.

That said, your case is valid. I just dislike my services dangling out without proper security, unless they’re designed for it, and plex’s auth model rubs me the wrong way.

Why not?

Tailscale.

Yeah, you can lead a horse to water, and whatnot.

Just use a password manager, goddamn.

And the UK goverment really REALLY wants to have backdoors put into every kind on encryption.

Well, I’m sure the two aren’t related.

I’d be curious how sensible you’ll find this proposal.

Yep, that way you can set ACLs, you they can only access the jellyfin ports + the ports you allow them to.

Also, tailacale DNS.

The fact that tailscale has google/apple/etc logon integration will also help.

Privileged drives and economilcally-and-socially-disadvanted-due-to-historical-injustices drives. The last ones a bit of a mouthful, so you can use EASDDTHJ drives.

He resigned immediately after making a culturally insensitive sentence to avoid vultures, and a vulture is swooping after him to capitalize on his poor judgment.

Okay, let’s not pretend it was a single misinterpreted sentence, and now poor Ashton is unfairly hounded.

So some drivers are not installed like I said

No, you said:

First of all they’re going to have to release a distro which actually has, shock horror, proprietary drivers installed on it, because your average user isn’t going to understand how to install them.

You’re moving the goalposts.

And what happens when that runs out?

Not really, because there’s still some processes in the human brain we don’t understand.

For example, you can list the steps and processes for every step an AI makes. You have to, in order to code and run it.

But you can’t list every step or process taking place in cases of sudden savant syndrome, for example.

This is exactly correct, except you’re also not accounting for the insane amount of computational power that would be necessary to backtrack a single output of a single model. This is why it is a black box. It simply is not possible on a meaningful level.

It’s not practical, but it can be done. We simple don’t have the time or inclination to do it.

It’s like like saying we don’t understand how an internal combustion engine works. Every explosion is a bit different, it pushes the pistons a bit less or more, it leaves a bit more or less residue in different places. We can’t backtrack and check every cycle and every part on a meaningful level, but we understand of it works, and we could do it if we wanted to. It’s just not practical.

As an example from my field: if you damage the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a fully grown adult, they will have the impulse control of a three-year old. We know this because we have observed damage to this area in multiple individuals, and can measure the effects based on the severity of that damage.

Okay so explain how sudden savant syndrome works. Step by step, biochemical process by biochemical process.

In contrast, if you provide the same billion-parameter neural network identical inputs, you will not receive identical outputs.

If you take the same model, put it in a VM, give it an input, get an output and the restore the VM to the exact same state before and ensure there’s no randomness, the model will give you same output.