![](https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/98e00977-111f-4f17-bd1e-8244f019a8ca.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Materialious doesn’t use remote fonts by default, only as a backup if local font loading fails. For some reason ublock in hard mode makes local font fail loading & remote font is used.
Open source developer & privacy advocate.
Materialious doesn’t use remote fonts by default, only as a backup if local font loading fails. For some reason ublock in hard mode makes local font fail loading & remote font is used.
Materialious contains zero trackers. Believe this was a issue with ublock falsely flagging local fonts as trackers or something, someone else open a issue on the repo with a similar issue. Feel free to review the source code for any trackers.
Maybe with the Materialious frontend
https://github.com/WardPearce/Materialious
Cough cough might be a plug
Home page is the “popular” page what is pulled from Invidious’ API. Basically just the popular videos people have been watching on that instance.
I enjoy confusing people.
Thanks for your interested. Currently this is just a alternative frontend for Invidious. But I am open to integrating other services into Materialious.
Might even include some free viruses!
capy.life creator here, incredible tool
Its considered a highly experimental feature, so enabling it could result in unknown issues or even security issues.
Also Firefox still lacks isolatedProcess https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1565196
I’d imagine Firefox would enable Fission by default if it was actually ready.
about what i expected
I’m happy for you to provide references what prove me wrong.
yes you must not be federated.
My other comment what you must be referring to is “most insecure android stack”, doesn’t have references I agree & it probably should (thats why i edited it to include them) but its also on people to do their own research and if someone is commenting that their stack is insecure, maybe that person could ask me why or do a little research themselves (instead of just downvoting. Or they could just downvote & ask a question too!).
Also I’m not saying down votes is “harassment” thats insane, people can down votes as much as they want. I’m just over people unwilling to see insecurities after I provide references (like in the comment you can’t see responses to)
Shocker not every comment I make will be prefect & if people genuinely wanted to learn ask questions!
Also this whole idea that its a “negative attitude” is insane, I’m literally telling someone the software they use is insecure.
How did I disregard it? He literally provided a reference what countered his own point.
Like please, if you actually have a point to make. I’d love to know how he corrected me at all.
I think trashing is a overstatement, I’m providing references to my point (Also I LOVE firefox and use it on my desktop what i mentioned! It lacks basic security features on Android, that is not trashing on Firefox!) and I was deffo a bit hostile because he was obviously responding in bad faith.
not sure how I’m being smug (please point to my excessive pride in my achievements) but okay, “harassed” is deffo a overstatement but I’m just sick of people like this https://lemmy.nz/comment/1506835 while I’m trying to help people.
But aside that, people shouldn’t be a asshole to someone just because they come off smug 🤷
The most insecure Android stack
Edit: Because people will just blindly down vote this, here is some references to help you make more informed choices
https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2021/05/introducing-firefox-new-site-isolation-security-architecture/
The amount of Firefox fanboys who will get mad at you for mentioning Android Firefox missing per-site process isolation. I’ve basically made the choice to not mention it anymore because I always get harassed whenever I do lol…
Firefox on desktop is awesome, Mobile should be avoided.
Certbot is great when using Nginx (or Apache2), but if you can use a different engine. Its worthwhile checking out Caddy!
yea original comment included something along the lines of “im not going to buy it even if i don’t need a 3.5mm jack, just out of morals”
if only USB C headphones existed, also 3.5mm jacks aren’t prefect and tend to snap and get warn out quite quickly.
But like your comment is completely beside the point, your allowed to want a headphone jack and u can freely dictate your purchasing habits due to that. But it isn’t anything to do with Morals
Waterfox is a neat project, but is often slow to implement security patches from Firefox upstream.