![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
While I respect your right to express your opinion, I must state that your opinion is just as valid or void as the previous. I couldn’t know which. How would I?
While I respect your right to express your opinion, I must state that your opinion is just as valid or void as the previous. I couldn’t know which. How would I?
Yeah, an incorrect cleaning procedure can cause a error that requires maintenance personnel to reset the error. They don’t need to do anything else though, it’s completely fine to just do the cleaning again. Stuff like that.
He did say “HOPEFULLY just innocent mistakes…” Which we all should hope whether we think all allegations are true or not.
There’s different kind of “memories” when talking about metals but this is probably not related to that. What I suspect happened is cold fusion in a very clean environment without oxygen (or very low oxygen) where oxidation doesn’t happen, allowing the very very small fractures to reattach.
Yeah and preventing that from happening in space is rather complex task. Especially on parts that grind against each other causing the existing oxidized layer to wear off.
This was definitely a fuckup from Slack but as I’ve understood it, the “AI training” means that they’re able to suggest emoji reactions to messages.
Not sure how to think about this, but here’s some additional info from slack: https://slack.engineering/how-we-built-slack-ai-to-be-secure-and-private/
Edit: Just to pick main point from the article:
Slack AI principles to guide us.