Can you be more specific? I’d like to know what it’s missing.
Can you be more specific? I’d like to know what it’s missing.
It’s basically a book you can talk to. A book can contain incredibly knowledge, but it’s a preserve artifact of intelligence, not intelligence.
Great way to lose all the best people at your company in a totally uncontrolled manner.
And he’s blaming the anti defamation league…
Shouldn’t that already be covered under revenge porn laws? At least the distribution side of it.
Have you people never heard of a phone book? Phone numbers aren’t sensitive information. If they want to scrape your phone number they can legally and trivially do so through public data sources. Google does plenty of sketchy things around privacy, but this isn’t one of them, it’s just about security.
Wait until they hear about this thing called a phone book.
There’s also this thing called a phone book which has almost everyone and their number in it. Phone numbers are not sensitive information, period.
Especially when they already have access to your entire email history. If they wanted your phone number for nefarious means it will probably be somewhere in that history already. Your email already requires complete trust in the email provider service, there’s so much more sensitive stuff they already have access to.
Calling them psychologists is giving them too much credit, but you’re right that the companies trying to trick them are putting tons of resources into it.
Poor error handling on your client.
Most mushrooms won’t kill you
That’s not very reassuring
That is such a cool launch pad
Even for indexes I do index
or something more specific for what it’s indexing. Any simple iteration I just do map
or each
so the only time I ever need to actually index things is for more complex scenarios in which case it’s worth it to have better names. Also with modem IDEs, auto complete is really good so you don’t need to write a full variable name more than once.
So ignore all the things he says should be done beyond deplatforming and just get angry about made up assumptions that you extrapolated off your interpretation of tone? Get outta here
I’m sure too, it’d just be a funny situation
Most of his suggestions are just advocating for greater transparency. What’s the weird part?
Lots of Asian fish dishes are served with bones in them. What if he doesn’t know how to eat around them and chokes?
This ruling seems to be really badly misinterpreted. The case wasn’t for people using ai tools to create works but from a computer scientist who created a completely autonomous tool and was trying to co-copyright the works with the tool. Copyright needs human involvement, how much human involvement is still not hard law, but if you integrate the output of an AI and integrate it into a larger work that is very much covered.
Isn’t new York flooded right now?