With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.
With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.
For now. After more and more websites break down, they will comply or start to lose people
It’s regional, some countries and states only. They’re doing it slowly to boil the frog alive if you understand. It’s not something that requires your sharing it’s been on new sites already, it’s old news.
It still uses chromium and it’s susceptible to the Google’s Web integrity protocols. An website using the new protocols can refuse to load on your browser if you don’t accept the ads. Why is it so difficult to comprehend?
You’re kinda making a pointless. You’re telling me VPN is banned but with extra steps
Tbh better for the consumer to pay for a newspaper than have it run by some billionaire who can afford to run it endlessly free of charge just so he can propagate his world view.
For example, The Washington Post now run owned by Jeff bezos give all the free articles how keeping the billionaire class and cooking the planet is actually a good thing
Gabe Newell will die one day and with him the age of gaming shall die as well.
Any other owner would sell out to the billions of amazon and microsoft.
Do you use subs?
Outsourcing in Europe is heavily scrutinised and regulated due to companies kept choosing to depend on third party agencies do they don’t have to do with strikes and unions.
I’ve been accused and then shunned after some valuables went missing at a house party.
I was the only minority. Nobody dared to stand up for me and everybody just pointed fingers to the weakest individual.
Branded as a thief despite my life long upstanding morality, career, ethics.
Why would you buy a phone from a company that serialises their components? C’mon, consumers aren’t that stupid! They would never spend money against their own good!
People would still go. People go new york for new york not for a resort
Fuck chromium and fuck Google
They get their money back
We should maybe stop polluting a but and Africa might stop being a convection oven that roasts millions of people
Such a rare opinion sounds too academic for the barren minds
100% satire. Most core maga’s aren’t huge techies, you won’t see them around here, they’re too busy burning the capit0l
Did you just wake up from eternal slumber? Everytime you buy something that arrived by lorry, be it even a tomato, everyone pays for the taxes directly and indirectly.
whoever gets paid to transport stuff around will need to buy fuel for their bussines so they can successfully deliver the goods they’ve been hired to deliver. So the company that owns the ships will get a full tank from the port, this time it will only be way more expenses due to taxes, and that maybe will push the the owners into investing into greener technology to transport goods that isn’t as polluting.
Who keeps the taxes? The country whose port the shop was residing while fueling up.
It is sarcasm. Britsbongs are too indebted to hang on sync and they’d rather sniff nitrous under a bridge
A true arbon neutral watch would cost the same but there’d be no profit left for the brand if they really did donate to companies that would plant trees or would lock away carbon dioxide