4·
4 hours agoSeem like major oversight
- 1 Post
- 25 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
Cake day: March 22nd, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Let them cook we need more competition
Not paywalled link
I’m not saying it is bad but it doesn’t compete with new nividia cards. For example if you want performance of 5070 you go with either rx9070 or 5070, but if you want 3060 you can get AMD Intel or NVIDIA and this is where this card is currently.
But let’s hope next gen will be comparable to 4070 so it will be more of competition to them.
More like competition to Intel considering these cards performance is similar to 3060
But think about Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron shareholders
Why bother with expensive waste disposing process when you can just dump it somewhere.
1 runtime is ≈1gb
24.08 1gb
2xQt 250 mb
2xGNOME 250 mb
25.08 1 gb
2xQt 250 mb
2xGNOME 250
It gets big fast.
If you have one app with outdated runtime it is additional 1 gb for just runtime. If you rely mostly on system packages most packages you install from flatpak will have additional weight of 1 gb runtime. So you can get app which weights 4mb with runtime which weight 250 more than app itself.
And other flatpak repos use other runtimes for example fedora.
Appimages weight much less but lack sandboxing.
I hadn’t tried nix but it also lacks sandboxing.
2·4 days agoThere is also
Linglong which is flatpak/snap/appimage alternative but I don’t know it’s adoption on distros other than deepin
“Important note: Many users are wary of Snaps. Use at your own discretion. They update on their own schedule, and install files to nonstandard locations. It may not be wise to use a Snap without first understanding the reputation/limitations of Snap.”
I don’t think it will happen anyway, considering ARM still doesn’t do it and we have apple M chips and snapdragon ARM laptops.
But let’s hope I’m wrong
If it was backdoor that means someone created it maliciously or it is bug?
It was patched in almalinux though, and it was how this exploit got exposed before disclosure.
At lest this is what I read
Does risc-v have uefi like x86 or it requires specific image for every machine like before?
Great I will try it out.
Next step could be equivalent to backend for major stores.
It was this supposedly distroless distros based on flatpak runtime?
Why not just use nix? It also can be sandboxed using bwrap.
In my opinion focus should be on GUI for nix, brew.
Well I assume that if it is enabled by default there is nefarius thoughts involved, but when it isn’t devs have to little data to work with…
Win AI race to replace as many humans as possible and have monopoly on solution.
Messiah is there.