I don’t like GOS devs, they are not focused on usablity, but on security (which is completely valid, but it’s a shame that GOS is the most usable mobile OS), but holy based.

If you are disputing AI utility in coding: Recent Linux kernel versions fixed up to 3 times more CVEs in comparision to releases before AI. Also, much less of those CVEs are found in the newer versions, which means new kernel releases contain better code.

Wtf is a nibble?

Qwen 3.8 27B is very good at agentic work

Crazy stuff

You can fork it

Poor servo.

Fairphone can’t meet graphene security standards.

Graphene isn’t also that much better than the alternatives (when it comes to things other than security).

They are not wrong, when it comes to their platform

They are not wrong tho

Does that mean internet is fascist? Search engines? Calculators? Writing?

All of those things outsource your congnitive skills.

Almost nobody is saying that AI art generation is a complete subsitute for conventional art.

Even if all of that were true, it wouldn’t make AI fascist, but totalitarian.

So you agree with me, that AI is not fascist, but at the same time you say that one of goals of fascism is for people to think that AI is not fascist.

Am I reading it right?

In my opinion GrapheneOS, despite that not being its focus, is the most usable open source mobile OS, so that’s what I use

So maybe you should’ve started with that as your argument?

Assuming it is true, it doesn’t mean that they’re all fascist.

Did you watch it? It compares corporations itself to psychopaths, it’s nowhere said that CEOs/upper management are psychopaths.

Surveillence is not fascist.

Do most people use nemotron models?

This doesn’t mean all corporations are like that

That’s still not fascism.

Also, your logic is flawed: Some CEOs are right wing, so they would be willing to support fascism (because as we know, right wing = fascism)

In my opinion CEOs of most tech companies are just opurtunistic.

Fascism is when AI.

How is AI fascist?

Is it ultranationalist? Rejecting democracy? Anticommunist or antiliberal? Third position in economics? Anti egalitarian? Racist? Traditianolist socially?

I could maybe see an argument for it being anti egalitarian, but besides that, LLMs have none of those traits.

Fascism is when people can use AI.

1 & 2: it would work the same as all other EU specific things. You don’t need to comply with GDPR for people outside EU, you wouldn’t need to verify users outside the EU.

3: I don’t know what you mean. It could be easy to modify spec of those certs to include names.

4 You don’t know how this proposition is supposed to work.

In short:

There’re officially approved apps (you can’t just create you implementation arbitrary, but if you implementation meets all standards, you can work to have it approved). Using those apps, your credentials are secured with one (or many, I don’t understand that part) of:

• Hardware secure element
• Software secure element
• External device
• Server HSM operated by the provider

Those apps must also use some defined encryption standards.

When you create your app, it needs to be approved by one of the member states.

The app can store all kinds of personal governmental things such as your ID, bank account number, drivers license, etc.

When a service wants to know whether you are 18 or more, you can give them your wallet. The wallet app will show who demands what informations and a reason they put in the request. You can approve or reject the request.

It doesn’t have to be tied to google or anyone other.

Yes, those apps won’t be libre, but (and you don’t need to agree with me) in my opinion this is better than letting people create any implementation they want.

GrapheneOS can create thier implementation, that relies on hardware security chip. Linux distros can create a joint implementation reliant on yubikeys and alternatives.

Also, alternatives must remain.