• 2 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2024

help-circle
  • you didn’t do the wrong thing.

    what many people don’t notice is that support for a codec in gpu(in hardware) is two part. one is decoding and one is encoding.

    for quality video nobody does hardware encoding (at least not on consumer systems linux this 3050 nvidia)

    for most users the important this is hardware support for decoding so that they can watch their 4k movie with no issue.

    so you are in the clear.

    you can watch av1 right now and when av2 becomes popular enough to be used in at least 4 years from now.


  • maybe, maybe not.

    when h264 was introduced (Aug 2004), even intel had HW encoding for it with sandybridge in 2011. nvidia had at 2012

    so less than 7 years.

    av1 was first introduced 7 years ago and for at least two years android TVs require HW decoding for it.

    And AMD rdna2 had the same 4 years ago.

    so from introduction to hardware decoding it took 3 years.

    I have no idea why 10 years is thrown around.

    and av1 had to compete with h264 and h265 both. ( they had to decide if it was worth implementing it)






  • I get the intel lower power when not doing stuff (wish amd had high/low config for cores too) but what I mean was, in laptop cpus that are not on battery (just connected to power) does amd do more with the same power usage?

    if the comparation can not be done with the same gen cpus from two companies, then maybe a similar power usage cpu from amd and one from intel (laptop of course), do they for example have similar geekbench benchmark results? (for lack of better tool)

    so what I am asking is I dont care that is the same gen amd and intel laptop cpu with both connected to socket power, if amd is better. I want to know if for the same power usage (not idling but working) amd is better or not.




  • I don’t think that is how it works. For example I don’t think you can get google security update for older android without updating the whole system. there were monthly google security update that are going to become less frequent.

    Also I think the part that stops the apk installation (those not signed with signature in google database) are checked by google play services and that is installed in background which is the result of project treble and mainline that google implemented for modular updates without rom update. so you probably can’t stop google from doing this policy even if you stay on older ROMs.





  • Time to fund /e/OS GraoheneOS

    no.

    those are just android with some modification. two years from now google can easily disrupt them too.

    phones need a copyleft new OS. not a foss one, an actual copyleft one. with an independent group managing it.

    an OS that a company can decide what app I can run on it is just a surveillance apparatus gadget.

    google never wanted user to have control of their phone even 10 years ago.

    the easiest way to check this is to see if you can stop an installed app to ever do stuff without you explicitly opening it. they are so many “triggers” that apps can register and run based on them that user cant do anything about them. “wifi connected” “wifi disconnected” and so on.

    if an app can “listen” to these triggers and I cant disable it from listening to them (even for non-system apps) them I don’t really own my phone. then android is just a attention stealing spam machine at best and spying and terror gadget for world’s supremacist regimes too.

    I think even apple iOS has that option (disabling backgournd refresh per app ) and in that regard is better than android. If I wasn’t against non-foss software and I didn’t live in Iran, at this point apple iOS is not that different fro google and is more polished too.