For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Firefox and its derivatives (and Safari - sorry Apple users) are the only browsers not using Google’s Blink web engine these days - at least until Ladybird is released.

    Despite the Mozilla Foundation’s many stupid decisions, Firefox (and Safari) is starting to look like the only thing stopping Google from completely controlling the internet.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    it’s like people don’t remember what surfing the web was like before ad-blockers. If adblockers go away for real, people nerds will revolt

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              63
              ·
              4 days ago

              Those sites will be dead to me :)

              QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

              • Ghoelian@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                4 days ago

                On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

                I still won’t actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

                • Taldan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  How do the rewrites work? Is it like Redirector?

                  Would be awesome if I could just import my Redirector regex json file

                • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  After doing that, do you have an option to select which application you want to run (browser, video player etc?)

                  I use Open Link With, but would love to be able to edit the URL before.

                  Edit: From the description I think it might do that. This is neat, thanks for the recommendation.

              • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                Unfortunately, we’re fighting an uphill battle here.

                We’d need government regulation “protecting privacy”, instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".

                • nyan@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  At which point they cease to be your favourites, I hope. There are so many alternatives in that space that only inertia keeps people using the Empire of Evil.

                • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  Searching is already dead. Every search results in 200 Ai articles full of bullshit, even Qwant or DuckDuckGo.

                  The corpo-web died already, y’all are just crying over the scraps.

                • Axolotl@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions

            • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              WTF? I don’t think I will use any sure that will enable this?

              How does that prevent bots? Ther are massive phone farms, that can’t scan QR?

              This only exists so they can link identity of your phone with your desktop computer.

      • Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        For people who want an opinionated browser… Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I’d rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sponsored shortcuts? They don’t have them, i did a clean install only some week ago so i doubt it’s a new thing

        • NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I haven’t seen any of those things yet, but I’ll try to keep an eye out. The only one I noticed was a default search engine to Google, but DDG was an easy enough option. I like libre wolf as well, but I’m not a fan of the updating scheme on my system.

        • M137@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Never seen those, and did a fresh install recently too. And zen has a lot of customization options, it’s also so damn well designed and is great to use.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      The MV3 support in firefox is even stricter than in Chrome. I found that chrome will let you sidestep CSP to make an HTTP request. Firefox won’t.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t understand what you found, but firefox still supports the web request blocking API for Mv3 extensions, which is what ublock needs.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I was debugging one of my favourite extensions this week to figure out why it didn’t work on firefox. It hadn’t been updated in years, so something changed in firefox in the last few months.

          I assume the Chrome version still works. I’m not installing it.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            if it hadn’t been updated in years then it will be an Mv2 extension, irrelevant to discussion of Mv3 strictness.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      FF support is getting worse and worse though.

      Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

      Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

      Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fun fact: many sites that say that they don’t support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox “less secure” or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

        (Not all sites ofc)

            • fizzle@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m not talking about sites that claim not to support FF. I’m talking about sites that have broken features when visited in FF.

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                Do you have any example? Can you send any link? I never experienced those problems myself so i want to try

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Chrome is doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by not following web standards. There are several websites I have used where the payment process or uploading process only worked in chrome.

                  Again, this is a problem with chrome doing things that breaks consistency between browsers that are supposed to be following the same web standards.

                • fizzle@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  This is very well documented, and a very common experience.

                  They were talking about exactly this on late night linux podcast just last week.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        That isn’t FF support. That is chrome doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by implementing non-standard functionality to abuse their market dominance.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure but if devs don’t test sites in Firefox then very they don’t support Firefox.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh look all the “chrome but in a different outfit” browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Communicating with external devices via USB or the old D-Sub connectors.

          Printers, microcontrollers, instruments, etc… Directly instead of through the OS.

          Notably, ESPHome Programmer uses it for flashing ESP32s wired. Other companies like Solo Motor Controllers use it for delivering a user GUI to customers that is always updated but that can switch between versions instantly for production without having to having to deal with window’s broken method of having to manually search and download .exes for every program.

        • baner@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          Even grapheneOS use it for adb into your phone to flash the images.

      • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Really? Holy shit I can switch to zen fully at work and at home and uninstall chromium. Webserial was literally the only thing I needed

        • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I heard about the web usb thing, it’s also going to be a game changer for me (I haven’t tried yet, hopefully it works)

        • Muffi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          Why the downvotes? I have 4 machines at work, and none of them can send code to a LEGO Spike Hub over bluetooth in Firefox but works perfectly fine in Chrome.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      4 days ago

      They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

      Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      God it still pisses me off what they did to my boy Opera. All of us left when they diverted after v12. We all saw this coming.

      Then Vivaldi came which I have tried in quite a while but it sucked. Firefox it is.

    • andz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s a damn shame, I’ve always liked Vivaldi otherwise. I’ve been dual running Vivaldi and Firefox for years now, Vivaldi for casual browsing and Firefox for more serious stuff + YouTube.

      Oh well, it’s time to do a full switch, I guess.

      Kinda funny, I’ve been doing the exact same thing with Win/Linux for approximately the same length of time. Needed Win because of dome software that just doesn’t work linux, and sadly, I still do.

      Google and Microsoft can go fuck each other with a frozen cactus for all I care.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        The folks at Vivaldi have been doing some work on their internal ad blocker, I think with the intention to bring most of the functionality of uBo internally so that it doesn’t have to be an extension. Not sure how far along they are, but maybe they’re intentionally keeping it quiet.

        • reka@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Vivaldi have earned and deserve a lot of trust here I believe. All my chromium eggs sit in their basket.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, on a technical level chromium isn’t a terrible browser engine. Building your own engine from scratch is Extremely Hard™ and it’s entirely possible to build a decent browser on top of it, so I can understand why most alternative projects have done just that.

      It’s just… google’s control over chromium is concerning.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The browser wars have been kind of strange from the perspective of someone who’s been using Firefox for well over a decade. It’s a bit like hearing about the Civil War while living in Oregon.

    • henfredemars@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      194
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        132
        ·
        4 days ago

        I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn’t been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          75
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

          That’s the crazy thing.

          You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you’re selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

          But I don’t care how many crocodile tears they shed about ‘but websites depend on ad income’ – I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don’t care if it’s in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there’s plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

          So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, they can host a GIF on their server & show it to me with a non-personalized link, & promote it where they believe the average reader might be interested in it. Or some reader(s).

            Just show me the ads you’re showing everybody else, and make money from sales of useful things & services.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s not even that hard to have targeted ads while still respecting privacy – just base the targeting on the other content on the page, rather than on the user.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          4 days ago

          Internet Browsers store way too much data and have waaaay too many permissions. It’s sickening.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            not enough, what they want is personal data to mine. they cant do that in simple terms. meta, glassdoor, indeed , linkden,(plaid) tries to use convoluted mehtods to get you to give up more personal data than you normally would in order to access the rest of the site.(glassdoor and indeed has an additional reason to want you ridentiy)

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s because people don’t go into these offices with fire and guns. If a bunch of advertising people were slaughtered every few weeks things may get better.

          Same goes for collections, eventually no one will want to do the job.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        The whole industry is bad actors. The quaint, pastoral idea of actually advertising things you genuinely might want to know about is utterly beyond dead, it died the moment they realized they could use the same pipeline to harvest data and manipulate and control people. Using it for mere advertising is a waste of everyone’s time and resources when they have an option so much more lucrative on the table.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Over 10 years ago someone at my office had their work PC and user drive encrypted with ransomware because of a bad ad injection from one of those job search sites. Thankfully it was limited to nothing critical and incremental backups restore the drive…but hopefully they found a good lead because they were canned.

      If they’d had a good ad blocker this would have been a non issue

      • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        I work in IT: Pretty much all the malware we deal with comes from ads. I’ve pitched making ad blocking standard but they never go for it, even though it’s clear it would prevent an absolute shit ton of attacks. It’s crazy!

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seriously. If Google really wants to shove ads down our throats, they could at least regulate them so they’re not constantly horny scams. But that would cost them money, oh the humanity.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ublock was already somewhat neutered on Chrome, and people didn’t seem to notice. They keep using it.

    I’m just so cynical these days. It’s not like the Windows XP era, where people eventually get fed up with enshittification, and move.

    Google won. Facebook won.

    They have absolute control, basically.