It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).
Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.
Do you actually expect anything useful from searching for “how does the 2-party system affect the WHO”?
Or do you expect random people on the internet to read your comment and suddenly dedicate an hour to researching your claim? If so, i admire your optimism.
I don’t expect anything I’m happy to keep putting out the content regardless of what knuckle draggers happen upon it