Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIt’s not censorship to stop hateful online content, insists UN rights chiefnews.un.orgexternal-linkmessage-square318linkfedilinkarrow-up1773arrow-down136
arrow-up1737arrow-down1external-linkIt’s not censorship to stop hateful online content, insists UN rights chiefnews.un.orgSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square318linkfedilink
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38arrow-down15·1 year ago“BAAAHHH!!! YOU’RE CENSORING MY HATE SPEECH, RACIST SLURS AND DEATH THREATS!!! WAAAAAAHHHHH!!!” That CANNOT be the arguement you stand behind.
minus-squareUllallulloo@civilloquy.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoI mean, we do that. Just say it’s good to censor bad things. There’s nothing wrong with that, so don’t lie about what you’re doing.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaresorghum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·1 year agoNo one said it had to be platformed, but call a spade a spade
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThe argument is the dictionary.
“BAAAHHH!!! YOU’RE CENSORING MY HATE SPEECH, RACIST SLURS AND DEATH THREATS!!! WAAAAAAHHHHH!!!”
That CANNOT be the arguement you stand behind.
I mean, we do that. Just say it’s good to censor bad things. There’s nothing wrong with that, so don’t lie about what you’re doing.
deleted by creator
No one said it had to be platformed, but call a spade a spade
The argument is the dictionary.
Which one?