• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    21 days ago

    Meta can use web scrapers to crawl and collect content from websites “associated with” business accounts on its platforms, according to its new commercial terms of use.

    Not valid here (means, it does not really give them that permission), and they could get sued if they used such t&c here.

    • Molvorin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      21 days ago

      They seem to not mind being sued. For them it’s just a fee that they calculate into their expenses

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        They seem to not mind being sued

        Oh, I didn’t mean it because of money, but the court could specifically order them to not use such clauses in T&Cs anymore.

        (And then, in case of disrespecting court orders, that would hurt them financially so much that they’d think more than twice)

        • Molvorin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          But until then, and until it has gone through several courts and eventually settle, they can harvest all they want

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    21 days ago

    The updated terms explicitly state that Meta can use the content it collects from associated websites to “train” Meta products. Elsewhere in its terms of service, the company defines “AI at Meta” as one of those products.

    I would have assumed they were already doing that.

    Reminds me of why I quit WhatsApp, they started requiring uploading your entire phone address book and I wasn’t willing to allow that.

  • joey_builds@eviltoast.orgBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    The interesting wrinkle is that this is effectively a consent laundering scheme. Individual users can’t meaningfully opt out of AI training across the ecosystem, and now business accounts ‘consent’ on behalf of every visitor whose data passes through their sites. The website operator agrees to terms covering content they don’t solely own — comments, bylines, photos of third parties.

    Legally the news organizations are in a bind that’s worth watching: block Meta’s crawler and lose distribution, or allow it and hand over training data to a company building the models that flatten their traffic. The Nieman Lab angle makes sense — for publishers this is choosing between two slow bleeds.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    You better understand the move to open source office tools when you read about Techbros and demented presidents in action.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    Keep enshitifying, Meta, keep going.

    Of course I can say that having mindfully avoided Meta apps for years. Some people are stuck on them because it’s what their boss uses.

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    i dont use facebook or instagram BUT I have to rely on Whatsapp. My workplace uses it, my family uses it, my friends use it…etc.

    • inari@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Easier said than done when all your friends and family use WhatsApp and Instagram

      • Havatra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        That’s the same issue everyone has/had, including me. You’d be surprised how alright it works to use SMS and phone calls once you get used to it. It’s honestly refreshing. You don’t have to go that far, necessarily, as there are other messaging services out there that I’m sure your circles find better than SMS.

        Sure, you might miss out on some events and stuff due to others needing to remember that you’re no longer on Meta platforms, but just be a little persistent and they’ll remember to include you, just like they did me ;-)

      • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I said the same thing then took the plunge a year or so ago. Now the people that I used to keep up with on FB text and interact directly with me more often even than FB and I enjoy it more… Also don’t have to incidentally see all the assholes in the process.

      • dracc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Nah, works fine. Sure, you won’t get a nudge every 15 minutes but that’s (surprisingly to some) totally okay. Just quit, there’s other ways to keep contact with the people you care about.

      • BeelzebubEiNukuKoskaan@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I sent everyone a message, roughly “hey I’m moving away from Meta products. From now on you can contact me through SMS or Signal.” All the important ones followed me to Signal, not all, but enough. The rest are using SMS or calling, some have stopped contacting completely. Which is sad, sure. But I look at it as they don’t think I’m important enough for them to spend 30 seconds installing Signal or using a SMS that is already available for them. So I assume they don’t like me very much, which is fine. I don’t think about them too much either.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Have you checked the price of stamps lately? In the US, they are $0.82 now. You should use a carrier pigeon instead. You can even use IPoAC to send an e-mail by pigeon.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            The USPS has gone to shit. I used to order packages, first class, every 3 weeks or so. For my entire life it took 2-3 days, until idk 2018 it crept upwards, by 2021 it was more like 3-5 days, 2025 or so it crept up to 7 or more days.

            It’s on purpose obviously. The USPS is mandated in the constitution too, but they want to get rid of it anyway, and the dems haven’t done shit to restore it, and yes I know of their performatively throwing money at them during biden’s term, which changed nothing.

            • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              If the Republicans do get rid of USPS, some (probably red) rural areas will discover they no longer get shipments of any kind. Only USPS is mandated to ship to all far-reaching locations in the US, and commercial services hand their parcels over when delivering the last mile is not profitable.

      • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        True, but customers also go to where businesses are. People are feeling pressured to use these services by businesses that only have a presence there.

  • plsnerf7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Damm. Sorry dumping some rant, my work forces us to use whatsapp, so far my chat is a bunch of numbers didnt give access to contacts. Most of the time idk who is talking to me. I have two pixels with graphene os, 1 for work and my personal. And vpn always on. Also i disable the javascript in Ironfox, ublock chilling in extensions. At this rate im about to euthanize the fam network and block all meta related incoming and outgoin.