Amazon CEO Andy Jassy warns remote workers: ‘It’s probably not going to work out for you’::Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees who defy his edict to return to the office three days a week that “it’s probably not going to work out for you.”

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a really nice way of threatening to take away the livelihood and health insurance of people doing work for you.

      • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well see, we’re kinda trapped right now. We can go chopping heads off, get thrown in the news cycle for a few days, and then continue losing everything we got trapped in anyways.

  • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jassy told his employees that he spoke to scores of other CEOs and that “virtually all of them” preferred having their employees back in the office.

    CEOs try not to think they’re the center of the world, the challenge.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Should workers be subjected to pointless and dehumanizing drudgery that serves no practical purpose? Find out what this panel of five overpaid CEOs think, after the break.”

    • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      In other unbiased polling, the wolf spoke to all the other wolves in the pack and they all prefer that the sheep be eaten.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      I spoke with virtually all of the workers, and none of them want to pay rent. Yet here we are.

      CEOs can get bent through a videocall

  • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More likely that it doesn’t work out for Jassy. Certain Amazon units are underperforming under his leadership, and I wouldn’t be shocked if his time at Amazon didn’t last that much longer.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Always has been. Since we abolished slavery (some restrictions apply) the US has been working to continue the grift by any means, whether sharecropping, the truck system, exploiting immigants, exploiting children, anti-union legislation and so on.

      Despite our promises of liberty and equality, the US really wants to be a feudal hegemony.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve gotten so much recruitment crap from Amazon. This kind of crap is why none of those worked out for them.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I keep telling them I’m not interested, only to have someone new reach out. It’s frustrating. They don’t even pay that well.

      I guess if your desperate in the software development/DevOps industries, but even the smaller companies pay as much as they do.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Too many libertarians in tech. Will never happen.

      Source. In tech. Not libertarian.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nothing incompatible about libertarianism and unions. It’s a free market construct, a free association of people formed to put a check on the power of wealth. With a long history of acting as a check on one of the forces that seek to destabilize a free market in favor of state control, one might add (corps love to team up with the state to gain power).

        Though, caveat, libertarians might have a word against unions of state employees due to the mechanics of unions bartering against politicians who only stand to lose someone else’s funds (the public), through state mechanisms which libertarians may oppose. Obviously this is more problematic with police unions than teacher’s unions.

        Of course, there’s the FOX News “libertarians” who aren’t thinking any of this through and are just rehashing whatever FOX News is slinging. Basically indistinguishable from year 2000 “conservatives” plus all the culture war and 4chan talking points of the last 20 years. (edit: They would most likely be anti-union across the board, of course).

        • vector_zero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Libertarianism aligns perfectly well with fighting against big corporations. Anything in favor of freedom from a ruling class, whether it be governmental or corporate in nature, should be okay with libertarians.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why can’t the world be a meritocracy bro?! Do you hold crypto?! To the moon amiright?! Hey I pull constant on calls and work weekends from the comfort of my chair in my home office I know what hard labour is these union workers have no idea what hard work is bro.

          FML.

          Jesus forgot one.

          It’s easy to just make 6 figures bro I don’t see why everyone says it’s so hard. Just change jobs bro.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, we’re still high on our own farts to realise they can turn foul rather quickly.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given how many millions of people must have used Amazon to order stuff to work from home over the past 3+ years, this is a really weird position to hold. You’d think this guy would be all about everyone kitting out their home office spaces.

    • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      used Amazon to order stuff to work from home

      Amazon makes almost no money on retail sales. They make their money from AWS and from advertisers.

      • ech0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even better then. With people WFH companies move their on-prem servers and applications to the Cloud like AWS!

        No matter how you dice this Amazon is fucking itself

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Amazon had $220 billion in first party online retail revenue in 2022 $117 billion from 3rd party online retail $80 billion from AWS $37 billion from advertising.

        Retail is amazons primary source of revenue.

        Historically Amazon has used revenue from other segments to fund new ventures. AWS is profitable now, but it only came to be from the huge numbers that retail posts.

        If it was truly the case that retail has no value, it would have been ditched ages ago, but in reality, the retail segment of the company enables other segments to be profitable. High revenue gives you liquidity, and Amazon’s vast infrastructure network provides lots of other opportunities for the business.

            • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nobody’s denying that retail enabled Amazon to get where they are today and continues to be an important aspect of the business. But the notion that increased retail demand due to remote work would be a major boon for the company’s bottom line is fundamentally flawed. If anything, sudden surges in demand tend to be costly, since their distribution network is tuned to be able to just barely meet expected demand.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not weird when you consider the average real estate lease for companies of this size is probably 10 years or more, so they are sitting on an inventory of empty or more empty than full offices, paying rent on them, but not having anyone in there. Also, many cities/states incentivize “butts in chairs” based tax breaks for companies that hire staff in their cities, and you don’t have butts in the chairs, you don’t have the tax breaks.

        • plz1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’d be buried in a contract somewhere. I only know about it because my company had that deal with a major city in the east coast.

      • BurtReynoldsMustache@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention the fact that said real estate is all in extremely expensive locales (Bellevue, WA for starters), so that’s a lot of money they’re blowing on unoccupied buildings.

  • meatuchu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think my favorite part of the Amazon RTO is the fact that there are many offices that charge you to park there

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I worked in an office I had to pay for parking in addition to paying for gas and wear and tear, ALLLLLLLL so I could have the very valuable experience of working in an open concept office that is perpetually loud and distracting

      But yeah… wfh is totally bad for productivity… give me a fucking break

    • stalfoss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is common in dense urban locations; parking is expensive, and getting free parking just for working somewhere is not expected at all.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a company expects me to come in multiple times a week to do their work, they should be paying for that time and money by an increase in salary which covers that expense.

        If I can do the same job without incurring that expense, and have been, why should I? All that means is I lose more money from my salary.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          One thing that would nip this ‘return to office’ bullshit in the bud would be paid travel time to the office.

          If they had to pay us for sitting in traffic instead of our paying to go to work their constant mewling would evaporate as they rush to reduce costs and increase productivity by having us WFH

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Uh, maybe, but it is also typical in healthcare and hospitals regardless of their location so your point while technically true is not valid here.

        Source: i worked for 10 years at 4 suburban hospital locations with their own parking lots and i always paid for parking, every. fucking. day.

  • bfg9k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remote Workers warn Amazon CEO Any Jassy: 'Working for a tyrant is probably not going to work out for us."

  • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the commercial real estate mortgage backed securities market. If everyone doesn’t pay office rent the collateralized debt of those places goes kaput, the security implodes like 2008 and the banking industry goes under.

    These CEOs are all invested. They don’t care about productivity, it’s all about saving their investments.

    • Repeated1642@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. I’ve been saying and seeing it since Covid. Offices are half empty. Main street footfall is shrinking. These zones are high premiun rents, owned by REITs and other comercial founds. If they are not occupied and ppl is not consuming on the next door shops, assets value is gone down. More colateral is going to be asked from their lenders. Also, municipalities don’t want to lose population as this can result on less budget from government… Of course they are going to put pressure on their CEO buddies to have spenders back to office.

      • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The loans for all the commercial real estate are also problematic. The banks don’t have liquidity to cover them it’s that simple. Hence the recent downgrade of banks which is a shot over the bow…

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Considering that the US has a almost nonexistent social system, the state is actively accelerating the gap between poor and rich by supporting onesidedly.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      and the banking industry goes under.

      Which translates to the banking industry learning some lessons and becoming more efficient. Yes, please.

      Other than that, some drop in realty prices is welcome.

      • Fraylor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only thing they’ll learn is the date their next rubberstamped bailout check from the government is going to come.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Will not happen. Too big to fail, ydda yadda.

        Despite the banks not having implement the promised mechanisms to avoid another crash.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not. I really hate it when Marx fans and Rand fans find something in common, and one of such rare things is thinking that preventing big trees from falling is somehow connected to normal economics.

          Naturally it’s the other way around, the more painful it is to make such mistakes, the more optimized the market is.

          Other than that, gambling on the assumption that regulators are going to save you is the same as cheating, stealing etc.

          It’s like the suicide joke again - “more suicide jumpers means fewer suicide jumpers”. Market economy is about evolution. If you impede evolution (say, with preventing somebody from failing or with copyright and patent laws), then it loses its main advantage over anything else.

    • bluemite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A large portion of their business relies on rapid manufacturing and delivery. They’re not concerned about the environment

      • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not an expert in Amazon but I thought Jassy was CEO of AWS, which would be amazon web services. For the uninitiated, AWS is basically a hosting company - they don’t just provide web services for amazon.com.

        Being the CEO of a company that specializes in using the internet and making those workers come into an office is especially ghoulish.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      And also start the compensated-hours clock the moment I step into the car. We’re giving you eight hours a day, not 12 now.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gonna need a hot lunch provided, laundry on-site, dog walkers, child care, a gym and a space where I can play guitar when I’m on a break

        Oooh you wanted me to give all that up for nothing? In that case you can get bent, get fucked, roll over and get fucked again. I left three jobs over RTO mandates. Every time I left it was for more money. Now I’m at a place that doesn’t even have an office, just Google meet and a PO box for physical mail.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        We also used to have paid lunches and breaks. We lost those in the 1980s.

        It would be remiss of me to neglect mentioning covering and mandating OSHA required breaks (and otherwise recognizing your worker are human beings) can improve their productivity to exceed the time and expense cost, so it’s not just being a good boss but economically sound.

        The failures of top-down management to even keep their own businesses working optimally is an indictment of capitalism at its core.

        • Obinice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We also used to have paid lunches and breaks. We lost those in the 1980s.

          What country? :-( Here in the UK that’s a basic given, like, super basic. How did your country lose that without an immediate huge general strike?

          I would never work somewhere that doesn’t give paid breaks, it’s not like it’s my actual free time, I can’t just go home and do whatever, etc. Wild.

          Honestly, come live here, or in the EU, you’ll be treated far better. If you don’t even get paid breaks, what about other basic human rights like paid sick leave, a minimum of a month of holiday days per year, can’t be sacked on the spot or without a valid reason (unfair dismissal), must be given reasonable (paid) notice as per contract, etc?

          If you are lacking any of those, then come here! Some countries don’t have free healthcare and cheap high quality public transport, we have those too! :-)

          • Lifted_lowered@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re going to need to take a look at your country’s immigration policies before you go ahead telling people to come

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              True. The UK has downgraded as a country since leaving the EU. You guys have only mildly better benefits than the US and a lot of things are more expensive.

              You’re a freaking island. Why would you leave the best trade agreement you’ll ever get??? For a different colored passport?!?

              The US, EU, China, India, etc. are all sending you the back of the line for trade negotiations. If you’re lucky, you might get the same terms as Mexico.

      • DefiantBidet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. If you’re lucky you can get pre taxed commuter benefits but that’s not much. My monthly bus pass is more than my credits and that doesn’t included parking or subways

  • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amazon employees who refused to relocate near main offices of their teams were told they either have to find a new job internally or leave the company through a “voluntary resignation.”

    How dumb does he think people are? This just makes me angry because they’re probably going to get away with it too.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      lmao, “voluntary resignation” is hilarious. If you plan to purge everyone who won’t relocate, you’re gonna have to do a layoff. This isn’t one of those layoffs that will impress investors, because it won’t represent efficiency or cost savings, but instead corporate dysfunction.

      If your workers aren’t voluntarily relocating to return to the office, they’re certainly not going to voluntarily forfeit their unemployment benefits by quitting. They’ll just stop working and wait for the pink slip.

      Unless they plan to attach a severance more valuable that unemployment benefits to the resignation, they’re fucking dreaming. Even so, that would be a hilarious misstep to offer Amazon employees a voluntary paid exit, because it would undoubtedly result in an unsustainable wave of resignations across the org.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      voluntary resignation

      I’m not a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer, this is not legal advice, offer not valid in Alaska, Hawaii or Puerto Rico, no warranty, either express or implied, is offered, do not pass go, do not collect $200

      With all that out of the way: This “voluntary resignation” garbage is their way of getting out of paying unemployment. If you’re ever in a situation like this where they change job requirements and tell you that if you don’t meet the new requirements you’ve “voluntarily resigned” call them on it. Keep doing the job as you did it before the change and make them fire you. For purposes of collecting unemployment, making broad unilateral changes to job requirements is called “constructive dismissal” and you’d still qualify to collect, but if you just don’t show up at all, turn in your 2 weeks or sign a letter of voluntary resignation then for unemployment purposes you’re considered to have quit rather than been fired and you can’t collect. If they tell you you have to come back to the office and you’re ready to quit about it just keep working from home til they fire you.

      Basically (very basically, laws vary state by state and this isn’t a perfect summary of any one state’s laws) the law says that employers are free to ask something different of employees after hire, but that after a certain point changes to the job requirements effectively mean that the employee is now working an entirely different job than what they were hired for. When changes are enough to constitute constructive dismissal the state is essentially treating it as though the employer fired the employee from the original job and simultaneously offered them a new one. Turning down that new job does not disqualify them from collecting unemployment for the old one. This concept was originally implemented to stop employers from avoiding unemployment charges by cutting an employee down to one hour per week or forcing them to work shifts opposite what they signed on for, then hoping they’ll quit rather than be fired. I haven’t seen whether return to office mandates constitute constructive dismissal, and I imagine it will be highly dependent on location and facts (were you hired remote or did you transition to remote from in-office and was the remote status communicated as temporary or permanent/a perk of the job are two that leap to mind). This is why I only recommend following this strategy if you intended to quit anyway. If you want to keep your job do what they tell you to do.

    • makar94@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would you quit? Continue working from home while lining up a new job. Or, if they don’t specify how long you have to be in on those 3 days, just clock in and go back home an hour later. Game the system, make it work for you. They do.

      • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re 10+ hours away clocking in for 2 minutes isn’t possible.

        If you’re ever in this situation, look up constructive dismissal. Basically its better to stay home and be “fired” and refuse the voluntarily resignation. That being said, the USA has a lot less protections for employees then Canada or Europe but it’s good to be informed anyway.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know what’s probably not going to work out for you, Andy Jassy? The next proletariat uprising.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s never going to happen.

      What really won’t work out for him is retention of top talent that values WFH.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think civilization will end way before americans grow a pair of balls and stand up against this breed of assholes